Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 34 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 80 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 198 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 461 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Two-Body Strong Decay of the 2P and 3P Charmonium states (2204.08236v3)

Published 18 Apr 2022 in hep-ph

Abstract: Two-body open charm strong decays of the $2P$ and $3P$ charmonium states are studied by the Bethe-Salpeter(BS) method combined with the $3P_0$ model. The wave functions and mass spectra of the $2P$ and $3P$ charmonium states are obtained by solving the BS equation with the relativistic correction. The strong decay widths and relative ratios of the $2P$ and $3P$ charmonium states are calculated. Comparing our results with the experimental data, we obtain some interesting results. Considering the $X*(3860)$ as the $\chi_{c0}(2P)$, the total strong decay width is smaller than the experimental data. But the strong decay width depends on the parameter $\gamma$ in the $3P_0$ model, and the mass and width of the $X*(3860)$ have large errors, we cannot rule out the possibility that the $X*(3860)$ is the $\chi_{c0}(2P)$. The $X(4160)$ is a good candidate for the $\chi_{c0}(3P)$, not only the strong decay width of the $\chi_{c0}(3P)$ is same as the experimental data, but the relative ratios $\frac{\Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3P)\to D\bar D)}{\Gamma(\chi_{c0}(3P)\to D*\bar D*)}\approx0.0019<0.09$, and $\frac{\Gamma({\chi_{c0}(3P)\to D\bar D*})}{\Gamma({\chi_{c0}(3P)\to D*\bar D*})}=0<0.22$ are consistent with the experimental results of the $X(4160)$. Taking the $X(4274)$ as the $\chi_{c1}(3P)$, the strong decay width is consistent with the experimental data, so the $X(4274)$ is a good candidate for the $\chi_{c1}(3P)$. Assigning the $X(4350)$ as the $\chi_{c2}(3P)$, the corresponding strong decay width is slightly larger than the experimental data. To identify if the $X(4350)$ is $\chi_{c2}(3P)$, many more investigations are needed. All of the strong decay widths and relative ratios of the $2P$ and $3P$ charmonium states can provide the useful information to discover and confirm these particles in the future.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.