Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Bridging the Gap between Language Models and Cross-Lingual Sequence Labeling (2204.05210v1)

Published 11 Apr 2022 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: Large-scale cross-lingual pre-trained LLMs (xPLMs) have shown effectiveness in cross-lingual sequence labeling tasks (xSL), such as cross-lingual machine reading comprehension (xMRC) by transferring knowledge from a high-resource language to low-resource languages. Despite the great success, we draw an empirical observation that there is a training objective gap between pre-training and fine-tuning stages: e.g., mask LLMing objective requires local understanding of the masked token and the span-extraction objective requires global understanding and reasoning of the input passage/paragraph and question, leading to the discrepancy between pre-training and xMRC. In this paper, we first design a pre-training task tailored for xSL named Cross-lingual Language Informative Span Masking (CLISM) to eliminate the objective gap in a self-supervised manner. Second, we present ContrAstive-Consistency Regularization (CACR), which utilizes contrastive learning to encourage the consistency between representations of input parallel sequences via unsupervised cross-lingual instance-wise training signals during pre-training. By these means, our methods not only bridge the gap between pretrain-finetune, but also enhance PLMs to better capture the alignment between different languages. Extensive experiments prove that our method achieves clearly superior results on multiple xSL benchmarks with limited pre-training data. Our methods also surpass the previous state-of-the-art methods by a large margin in few-shot data settings, where only a few hundred training examples are available.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Nuo Chen (100 papers)
  2. Linjun Shou (53 papers)
  3. Ming Gong (246 papers)
  4. Jian Pei (104 papers)
  5. Daxin Jiang (138 papers)
Citations (10)