Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

The Concordance Index decomposition: A measure for a deeper understanding of survival prediction models (2203.00144v3)

Published 28 Feb 2022 in cs.LG, stat.ME, and stat.ML

Abstract: The Concordance Index (C-index) is a commonly used metric in Survival Analysis for evaluating the performance of a prediction model. In this paper, we propose a decomposition of the C-index into a weighted harmonic mean of two quantities: one for ranking observed events versus other observed events, and the other for ranking observed events versus censored cases. This decomposition enables a finer-grained analysis of the relative strengths and weaknesses between different survival prediction methods. The usefulness of this decomposition is demonstrated through benchmark comparisons against classical models and state-of-the-art methods, together with the new variational generative neural-network-based method (SurVED) proposed in this paper. The performance of the models is assessed using four publicly available datasets with varying levels of censoring. Using the C-index decomposition and synthetic censoring, the analysis shows that deep learning models utilize the observed events more effectively than other models. This allows them to keep a stable C-index in different censoring levels. In contrast to such deep learning methods, classical machine learning models deteriorate when the censoring level decreases due to their inability to improve on ranking the events versus other events.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (9)
  1. doi:10.1145/3214306. URL https://doi.org/10.1145/3214306
  2. doi:10.1186/s12874-017-0336-2. URL https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-017-0336-2
  3. arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/sim.4780111409, doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780111409. URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/sim.4780111409
  4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2011.06.006. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0933365711000765
  5. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artmed.2019.06.001. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0933365718305992
  6. doi:10.1109/JBHI.2021.3052441.
  7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120218. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417423007200
  8. arXiv:1705.07215. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/1705.07215
  9. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1827/1/012066. URL https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1827/1/012066
Citations (14)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.