Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
80 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Quantifying Memorization Across Neural Language Models (2202.07646v3)

Published 15 Feb 2022 in cs.LG and cs.CL

Abstract: LLMs (LMs) have been shown to memorize parts of their training data, and when prompted appropriately, they will emit the memorized training data verbatim. This is undesirable because memorization violates privacy (exposing user data), degrades utility (repeated easy-to-memorize text is often low quality), and hurts fairness (some texts are memorized over others). We describe three log-linear relationships that quantify the degree to which LMs emit memorized training data. Memorization significantly grows as we increase (1) the capacity of a model, (2) the number of times an example has been duplicated, and (3) the number of tokens of context used to prompt the model. Surprisingly, we find the situation becomes more complicated when generalizing these results across model families. On the whole, we find that memorization in LMs is more prevalent than previously believed and will likely get worse as models continues to scale, at least without active mitigations.

Analyzing Memorization in Neural LLMs

Abstract

The paper "Quantifying Memorization Across Neural LLMs" investigates the phenomenon of memorization in LLMs (LMs) and its implications for privacy, utility degradation, and fairness. The authors present a comprehensive analysis, revealing that memorization is strongly correlated with model capacity, data duplication, and the contextual prompt length. The authors also predict that memorization is likely to increase with model scaling unless actively mitigated.

Introduction

As neural LLMs have increased in parameter size and training data, understanding the extent of memorization in these models has become crucial. The training data extraction attacks highlighted in this paper demonstrate that simple interactions can allow adversaries to extract memorized sequences from trained models. The focus here is on quantifying memorization and identifying factors influencing it across different model families and datasets.

Contributions

The authors provide detailed quantitative measurements of memorization in LMs by systematically evaluating:

  • Model Capacity: Larger models exhibit higher levels of memorization.
  • Data Duplication: Repeated examples in training data significantly contribute to memorization.
  • Prompt Context Length: Longer prompts facilitate the extraction of memorized sequences.

These findings expand the understanding of memorization dynamics beyond previous qualitative studies, positioning them against lower bounds on memorization complexities established earlier.

Methodology

The paper introduces robust methodologies to define memorization and evaluate it across diverse scenarios using two primary approaches: a uniform random sample of sequences and a sample normalized by duplication and sequence length. Definitions and procedures are contextually adapted for different model architectures, such as causal and masked LLMs.

Experimental Results

The authors show that memorization increases log-linearly with model size, highlighting a troubling trend as models continue to scale. Importantly:

  • Model Scale: Larger models like the 6 billion parameter GPT-J memorize more than smaller counterparts.
  • Data Duplication: Memorization directly correlates with the number of times data is repeated in the training set.
  • Context Length: Longer contexts make it exponentially easier to extract memorized data, stressing the importance of contextual prompting in privacy auditing.

Alternate experimental settings reinforced these findings, establishing the robustness of the results across different contexts and evaluation metrics.

Replication Studies

The paper extends its analysis to other LLMs, such as T5 and OPT families. While model size consistently influenced memorization, the relationship between memorization and data duplication proved more nuanced across different datasets and model architectures. For instance, deduplicated training sets in models like OPT showed reduced memorization susceptibility, emphasizing the potential of data preprocessing in mitigating memorization risks.

Implications and Speculations

The implications of this research are profound for theoretical and practical applications:

  • Privacy Concerns: There remains a critical need to address memorization in LLMs to protect user data. Differential privacy and dataset deduplication are potential, albeit imperfect, solutions.
  • Model Utility vs. Memorization Trade-offs: While scaling improves model utility, it simultaneously exacerbates memorization concerns, complicating ethical model deployment.
  • Future AI Developments: With continuing model scale, more robust strategies and frameworks are needed to ensure privacy without sacrificing the advancements in natural language processing capabilities.

Conclusion

The paper provides significant insights into the factors influencing memorization in neural LLMs, revealing that larger models memorize more and suggesting that memorization could intensify as models expand further. This presents challenges for privacy and ethical AI deployment. The paper underscores the importance of carefully managing data handling practices and integrating robust privacy-preserving mechanisms into AI systems. Future research is encouraged to refine memorization measurement techniques and explore innovative mitigation strategies.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Nicholas Carlini (101 papers)
  2. Daphne Ippolito (47 papers)
  3. Matthew Jagielski (51 papers)
  4. Katherine Lee (34 papers)
  5. Chiyuan Zhang (57 papers)
  6. Florian Tramer (19 papers)
Citations (499)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com