Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
136 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
11 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

An extended physics informed neural network for preliminary analysis of parametric optimal control problems (2110.13530v2)

Published 26 Oct 2021 in cs.LG, cs.NA, and math.NA

Abstract: In this work we propose an extension of physics informed supervised learning strategies to parametric partial differential equations. Indeed, even if the latter are indisputably useful in many applications, they can be computationally expensive most of all in a real-time and many-query setting. Thus, our main goal is to provide a physics informed learning paradigm to simulate parametrized phenomena in a small amount of time. The physics information will be exploited in many ways, in the loss function (standard physics informed neural networks), as an augmented input (extra feature employment) and as a guideline to build an effective structure for the neural network (physics informed architecture). These three aspects, combined together, will lead to a faster training phase and to a more accurate parametric prediction. The methodology has been tested for several equations and also in an optimal control framework.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. A. Atangana and A. Kılıçman. Analytical solutions of boundary values problem of 2D and 3D poisson and biharmonic equations by homotopy decomposition method. Abstract and Applied Analysis, 2013:380484, Sep 2013.
  2. Numerical modeling of hemodynamics scenarios of patient-specific coronary artery bypass grafts. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 16(4):1373–1399, 2017.
  3. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a survey. Journal of machine learning research, 18, 2018.
  4. Least-squares finite element methods, volume 166. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2009.
  5. Physics-informed neural networks for heat transfer problems. Journal of Heat Transfer, 143(6):060801, 2021.
  6. A weighted POD-reduction approach for parametrized PDE-constrained optimal control problems with random inputs and applications to environmental sciences. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 102:261–276, 2021.
  7. Optimal control of the stationary Navier–Stokes equations with mixed control-state constraints. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 46(2):604–629, 2007.
  8. L. Dede. Optimal flow control for navier–stokes equations: drag minimization. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 55(4):347–366, 2007.
  9. C. H. Ding and I. Dubchak. Multi-class protein fold recognition using support vector machines and neural networks. Bioinformatics, 17(4):349–358, 2001.
  10. Physics-informed neural operators. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.05748, 2022.
  11. M. D. Gunzburger. Perspectives in flow control and optimization, volume 5. SIAM, Philadelphia, 2003.
  12. Multi-fidelity regression using artificial neural networks: efficient approximation of parameter-dependent output quantities. Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 389:114378, 2022.
  13. Certified reduced basis methods for parametrized partial differential equations. SpringerBriefs in Mathematics, 2015, Springer, Milano.
  14. Optimization with PDE constraints, volume 23. Springer Science & Business Media, Antwerp, 2008.
  15. K. Ito and K. Kunisch. Lagrange multiplier approach to variational problems and applications, volume 15. SIAM, Philadelphia, 2008.
  16. Locally adaptive activation functions with slope recovery for deep and physics-informed neural networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 476(2239):20200334, 2020.
  17. Adaptive activation functions accelerate convergence in deep and physics-informed neural networks. Journal of Computational Physics, 404:109136, 2020.
  18. Conservative physics-informed neural networks on discrete domains for conservation laws: Applications to forward and inverse problems. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 365:113028, 2020.
  19. Nsfnets (navier-stokes flow nets): Physics-informed neural networks for the incompressible navier-stokes equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 426:109951, 2021.
  20. hp-vpinns: Variational physics-informed neural networks with domain decomposition. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 374:113547, 2021.
  21. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Y. Bengio and Y. LeCun, editors, 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings, 2015.
  22. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 25:1097–1105, 2012.
  23. A reduced computational and geometrical framework for inverse problems in hemodynamics. International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering, 29(7):741–776, 2013.
  24. Trends in PDE constrained optimization. Springer, New York, 2014.
  25. Physics-informed neural operator for learning partial differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.03794, 2021.
  26. All-optical machine learning using diffractive deep neural networks. Science, 361(6406):1004–1008, 2018.
  27. J. L. Lions. Optimal Control of System Governed by Partial Differential Equations, volume 170. Springer-Verlagr, Berlin and Heidelberg, 1971.
  28. Learning nonlinear operators via DeepONet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators. Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(3):218–229, Mar 2021.
  29. Data-driven physics-informed constitutive metamodeling of complex fluids: A multifidelity neural network (MFNN) framework. Journal of Rheology, 65(2):179–198, 2021.
  30. PPINN: Parareal physics-informed neural network for time-dependent PDEs. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 370:113250, 2020.
  31. M. Motamed. A multi-fidelity neural network surrogate sampling method for uncertainty quantification. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 10(4), 2020.
  32. S. Mowlavi and S. Nabi. Optimal control of PDEs using physics-informed neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.09880, 2021.
  33. Reduced basis approximation of parametrized optimal flow control problems for the stokes equations. Computers & Mathematics with Applications, 69(4):319–336, 2015.
  34. nPINNs: nonlocal Physics-Informed Neural Networks for a parametrized nonlocal universal Laplacian operator. Algorithms and Applications. Journal of Computational Physics, 422:109760, 2020.
  35. Accelerating physics-informed neural network training with prior dictionaries. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.08151, 2020.
  36. Driving bifurcating parametrized nonlinear pdes by optimal control strategies: Application to navier-stokes equations with model order reduction. ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis, 56(4):1361 – 1400, 2022.
  37. M. Pošta and T. Roubíček. Optimal control of navier–stokes equations by oseen approximation. Computers & Mathematics With Applications, 53(3-4):569–581, 2007.
  38. Reliable real-time solution of parametrized partial differential equations: Reduced-basis output bound methods. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 124(1):70–80, 2002.
  39. Numerical approximation of a control problem for advection-diffusion processes. In IFIP Conference on System Modeling and Optimization, pages 261–273. Springer, 2005.
  40. Reduced basis methods for optimal control of advection-diffusion problems. Technical report, RAS and University of Houston, 2007.
  41. A. Quarteroni and A. Valli. Numerical approximation of partial differential equations, volume 23. Springer Science & Business Media, Berlin and Heidelberg, 2008.
  42. Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 378:686–707, 2019.
  43. Hidden fluid mechanics: Learning velocity and pressure fields from flow visualizations. Science, 367(6481):1026–1030, 2020.
  44. Model reduction for parametrized optimal control problems in environmental marine sciences and engineering. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 40(4):B1055–B1079, 2018.
  45. POD-Galerkin model order reduction for parametrized nonlinear time-dependent optimal flow control: an application to shallow water equations. Journal of Numerical Mathematics, 30(1):63–84, 2022.
  46. Reduced order methods for parametrized non-linear and time dependent optimal flow control problems, towards applications in biomedical and environmental sciences. In Numerical Mathematics and Advanced Applications ENUMATH 2019, pages 841–850. Springer, 2021.
  47. F. Tröltzsch. Optimal control of partial differential equations. Graduate studies in mathematics, 112, Verlag, Wiesbad, 2010.
  48. D. Wang and W. Liao. Modeling and control of magnetorheological fluid dampers using neural networks. Smart materials and structures, 14(1):111, 2004.
  49. Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepONets. Science advances, 7(40):eabi8605, 2021.
  50. B-PINNs: Bayesian physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problems with noisy data. Journal of Computational Physics, 425:109913, 2021.
  51. Reduced order methods for parametric optimal flow control in coronary bypass grafts, toward patient-specific data assimilation. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, page e3367, 2020.
Citations (31)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now