Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 91 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 56 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 214 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 470 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 40 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Minkowski Functionals of SDSS-III BOSS : Hints of Possible Anisotropy in the Density Field? (2110.06109v1)

Published 12 Oct 2021 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: We present measurements of the Minkowski functionals extracted from the SDSS-III BOSS catalogs. After defining the Minkowski functionals, we describe how an unbiased reconstruction of these statistics can be obtained from a field with masked regions and survey boundaries, validating our methodology with Gaussian random fields and mock galaxy snapshot data. From the BOSS galaxy data we generate a set of four density fields in three dimensions corresponding to the northern and southern skies of LOWZ and CMASS catalogs, smoothing over large scales such that the field is perturbatively non-Gaussian. We extract the Minkowski functionals from each data set separately, and measure their shapes and amplitudes by fitting a Hermite polynomial expansion. For the shape parameter of the Minkowski functional curves $a_0$, that is related to the bispectrum of the field, we find that the LOWZ-South data presents a systematically lower value of $a_0 = -0.080 \pm 0.040$ than its northern sky counterpart $a_0 = 0.032 \pm 0.024$. Although the significance of this discrepancy is low, it potentially indicates some systematics in the data or that the matter density field exhibits anisotropy at low redshift. By assuming a standard isotropic flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmology, the amplitudes of Minkowski functionals from the combination of northern and southern sky data give the constraints $\Omega_{\rm c} h2 n_{\rm s} = 0.110 \pm 0.006$ and $0.111 \pm 0.008$ for CMASS and LOWZ, respectively, which is in agreement with the Planck $\Lambda$CDM best-fit $\Omega_{\rm c}h{2} n_{\rm s} = 0.116 \pm 0.001$.

Citations (13)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.