Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 72 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 57 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 23 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 219 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A New Census of the 0.2< z <3.0 Universe, Part II: The Star-Forming Sequence (2110.04314v2)

Published 8 Oct 2021 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We use the panchromatic SED-fitting code Prospector to measure the galaxy logM$*$-logSFR relationship (the `star-forming sequence') across $0.2 < z < 3.0$ using the COSMOS-2015 and 3D-HST UV-IR photometric catalogs. We demonstrate that the chosen method of identifying star-forming galaxies introduces a systematic uncertainty in the inferred normalization and width of the star-forming sequence, peaking for massive galaxies at $\sim 0.5$ dex and $\sim0.2$ dex respectively. To avoid this systematic, we instead parameterize the density of the full galaxy population in the logM$*$-logSFR-redshift plane using a flexible neural network known as a normalizing flow. The resulting star-forming sequence has a low-mass slope near unity and a much flatter slope at higher masses, with a normalization $0.2-0.5$ dex lower than typical inferences in the literature. We show this difference is due to the sophistication of the Prospector stellar populations modeling: the nonparametric star formation histories naturally produce higher masses while the combination of individualized metallicity, dust, and star formation history constraints produce lower star formation rates than typical UV+IR formulae. We introduce a simple formalism to understand the difference between SFRs inferred from spectral energy distribution fitting and standard template-based approaches such as UV+IR SFRs. Finally, we demonstrate the inferred star-forming sequence is consistent with predictions from theoretical models of galaxy formation, resolving a long-standing $\sim0.2-0.5$ dex offset with observations at $0.5<z<3$. The fully trained normalizing flow including a nonparametric description of $\rho(\log{\rm M}*,\log{\rm SFR},z)$ is made available online to facilitate straightforward comparisons with future work.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.