Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 100 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 33 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 103 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 200 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The MOSDEF Survey: Implications of the Lack of Evolution in the Dust Attenuation-Mass Relation to z~2 (2109.14630v2)

Published 29 Sep 2021 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We investigate the relationship between dust attenuation and stellar mass ($M_$) in star-forming galaxies over cosmic time. For this analysis, we compare measurements from the MOSFIRE Deep Evolution Field (MOSDEF) survey at $z\sim2.3$ and the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS) at $z\sim0$, augmenting the latter optical dataset with both UV Galaxy Evolution Explorer (GALEX) and mid-infrared Wide-field Infrared Survey Explorer (WISE) photometry from the GALEX-SDSS-WISE Catalog. We quantify dust attenuation using both spectroscopic measurements of H$\alpha$ and H$\beta$ emission lines, and photometric measurements of the rest-UV stellar continuum. The H$\alpha$/H$\beta$ ratio is used to determine the magnitude of attenuation at the wavelength of H$\alpha$, $A_{{\rm H}\alpha}$. Rest-UV colors and spectral-energy-distribution fitting are used to estimate $A_{1600}$, the magnitude of attenuation at a rest wavelength of 1600\AA. As in previous work, we find a lack of significant evolution in the relation between dust attenuation and $M_$ over the redshift range $z\sim0$ to $z\sim2.3$. Folding in the latest estimates of the evolution of $M_{{\rm dust}}$, $({M_{{\rm dust}}}/{M_{{\rm gas}}})$, and gas surface density at fixed $M_$, we find that the expected $M_{{\rm dust}}$ and dust mass surface density are both significantly higher at $z\sim2.3$ than at $z\sim0$. These differences appear at odds with the lack of evolution in dust attenuation. To explain the striking constancy in attenuation vs. $M_$, it is essential to determine the relationship between metallicity and $({M_{{\rm dust}}}/{M_{{\rm gas}}})$, the dust mass absorption coefficient, and dust geometry, and the evolution of these relations and quantities from $z\sim0$ to $z\sim2.3$.

Citations (17)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube