Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 71 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 196 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Vulnerability of Blockchain Technologies to Quantum Attacks (2105.01815v1)

Published 5 May 2021 in quant-ph, cs.CR, cs.CY, and cs.ET

Abstract: Quantum computation represents a threat to many cryptographic protocols in operation today. It has been estimated that by 2035, there will exist a quantum computer capable of breaking the vital cryptographic scheme RSA2048. Blockchain technologies rely on cryptographic protocols for many of their essential sub-routines. Some of these protocols, but not all, are open to quantum attacks. Here we analyze the major blockchain-based cryptocurrencies deployed today -- including Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and ZCash, and determine their risk exposure to quantum attacks. We finish with a comparative analysis of the studied cryptocurrencies and their underlying blockchain technologies and their relative levels of vulnerability to quantum attacks.

Citations (50)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper identifies quantum attacks using Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms as significant threats to blockchain cryptographic protocols like RSA and ECDSA.
  • It critically analyzes vulnerabilities in major cryptocurrencies, including Bitcoin and Ethereum, highlighting exposure in transaction signature mechanisms.
  • The study calls for rapid development and adoption of quantum-resistant algorithms and consensus methods to secure blockchain networks.

Overview of Blockchain Vulnerability to Quantum Attacks

The research paper entitled "Vulnerability of Blockchain Technologies to Quantum Attacks" presents a critical examination of how various blockchain technologies might be susceptible to quantum computational threats. Authored by Joseph J. Kearney and Carlos A. Perez-Delgado from the University of Kent, the paper explores the vulnerabilities of popular blockchain-based cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin, Monero, and ZCash against future quantum attacks.

The paper identifies quantum computation as a significant risk to existing cryptographic systems which underpin blockchain technologies. The core concern is that many cryptographic algorithms currently securing blockchains may be rendered ineffective by the capabilities of quantum algorithms. The paper emphasizes the need for anticipatory measures in cryptographic design, given projections that quantum computers capable of compromising widely used protocols like RSA2048 could materialize in the next few decades.

Key Findings

  1. Quantum Threats to Blockchain
    • The paper underscores the capability of Shor's algorithm to solve integer factorization and discrete logarithm problems in polynomial time, which threatens cryptographic protocols such as RSA and ECDSA. Špecifically, these protocols are widely used in generating blockchain transactional security.
    • Another threat is from Grover's algorithm, which provides quadratic speed-up in search problems, posing potential risks to consensus mechanisms like Proof of Work (PoW).
  2. Vulnerability Analysis of Major Cryptocurrencies
    • Bitcoin: The paper reveals Bitcoin's reliance on the ECDSA for transaction signatures, which could be undermined by a sufficiently powerful quantum computer using Shor's algorithm. Transactions exposed before incorporation into the blockchain could be manipulated, posing severe security risks.
    • Ethereum: Transitioning from PoW to Proof of Stake (PoS), Ethereum shares the transaction signature vulnerability due to its use of ECDSA. The account-based model of Ethereum further compounds risks as entire account balances could be targeted once a single transaction takes place.
    • Litecoin: As a derivation of Bitcoin, Litecoin faces similar vulnerabilities but benefits slightly from shorter transaction times that provide minimal resistance to potential quantum attacks.
    • Monero: Despite vulnerabilities attributable to EdDSA and potential exploitation of Pedersen commitments and Bulletproofs, Monero's anonymization features present an added layer of protection. The use of indistinguishable transaction inputs can deter potential attackers seeking high-value exploits.
    • ZCash: The research highlights ZCash as notably vulnerable due to its utilization of zk-SNARKs, which rely on public parameters that are not quantum-resistant. The potential ability of quantum adversaries to manipulate currency supply renders ZCash particularly susceptible.

Implications and Future Directions

This paper highlights several practical and theoretical considerations for blockchain networks in preparing for a post-quantum era. An important implication is the drive to develop and adopt quantum-safe algorithms and consensus mechanisms. The transition of Ethereum to PoS exemplifies attempts within the blockchain industry to adapt to evolving computational threats.

Theoretical work in post-quantum cryptography needs to be fast-tracked and integrated into existing blockchain infrastructures. The paper suggests that while PoW faces formidable quantum challenges due to intrinsic properties that invite Grover's algorithmic advantage, a shift towards PoS or other non-NP-based consensus strategies may be prudent.

Conclusion

The paper presents a comprehensive analysis of potential quantum threats, underscoring the urgency of deploying quantum-resistant measures across blockchain ecosystems. As quantum computing continues to advance, substantial effort must be directed towards not only mitigating these vulnerabilities but anticipating the evolution of encryption standards to safeguard transactional integrity and trust in decentralized systems.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com