Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A comparison of self-supervised speech representations as input features for unsupervised acoustic word embeddings (2012.07387v1)

Published 14 Dec 2020 in cs.CL and eess.AS

Abstract: Many speech processing tasks involve measuring the acoustic similarity between speech segments. Acoustic word embeddings (AWE) allow for efficient comparisons by mapping speech segments of arbitrary duration to fixed-dimensional vectors. For zero-resource speech processing, where unlabelled speech is the only available resource, some of the best AWE approaches rely on weak top-down constraints in the form of automatically discovered word-like segments. Rather than learning embeddings at the segment level, another line of zero-resource research has looked at representation learning at the short-time frame level. Recent approaches include self-supervised predictive coding and correspondence autoencoder (CAE) models. In this paper we consider whether these frame-level features are beneficial when used as inputs for training to an unsupervised AWE model. We compare frame-level features from contrastive predictive coding (CPC), autoregressive predictive coding and a CAE to conventional MFCCs. These are used as inputs to a recurrent CAE-based AWE model. In a word discrimination task on English and Xitsonga data, all three representation learning approaches outperform MFCCs, with CPC consistently showing the biggest improvement. In cross-lingual experiments we find that CPC features trained on English can also be transferred to Xitsonga.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Lisa van Staden (2 papers)
  2. Herman Kamper (80 papers)
Citations (16)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.