A Comment on and Correction to: Opinion dynamics in the presence of increasing agreement pressure (2012.05985v1)
Abstract: We identify a counter-example to the consensus result given in [J. Semonsen et al. Opinion dynamics in the presence of increasing agreement pressure. \textit{IEEE Trans. Cyber.}, 49(4): 1270-1278, 2018]. We resolve the counter-example by replacing Lemma 5 in the given reference with a novel variation of the Banach Fixed Point theorem which explains both the numerical results in the reference and the counter-example(s) in this note, and provides a sufficient condition for consensus in systems with increasing peer-pressure. This work is relevant for other papers that have used the proof technique from Semonsen et al. and establishes the veracity of their claims assuming the new sufficient condition.
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.