Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

When Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlook (2011.11819v1)

Published 24 Nov 2020 in cs.LG, cs.AI, and cs.CR

Abstract: The newly emerged machine learning (e.g. deep learning) methods have become a strong driving force to revolutionize a wide range of industries, such as smart healthcare, financial technology, and surveillance systems. Meanwhile, privacy has emerged as a big concern in this machine learning-based artificial intelligence era. It is important to note that the problem of privacy preservation in the context of machine learning is quite different from that in traditional data privacy protection, as machine learning can act as both friend and foe. Currently, the work on the preservation of privacy and ML is still in an infancy stage, as most existing solutions only focus on privacy problems during the machine learning process. Therefore, a comprehensive study on the privacy preservation problems and machine learning is required. This paper surveys the state of the art in privacy issues and solutions for machine learning. The survey covers three categories of interactions between privacy and machine learning: (i) private machine learning, (ii) machine learning aided privacy protection, and (iii) machine learning-based privacy attack and corresponding protection schemes. The current research progress in each category is reviewed and the key challenges are identified. Finally, based on our in-depth analysis of the area of privacy and machine learning, we point out future research directions in this field.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (6)
  1. Bo Liu (485 papers)
  2. Ming Ding (219 papers)
  3. Sina Shaham (18 papers)
  4. Wenny Rahayu (4 papers)
  5. Farhad Farokhi (80 papers)
  6. Zihuai Lin (64 papers)
Citations (255)

Summary

  • The paper provides a comprehensive review of privacy challenges across the ML lifecycle, covering defenses like differential privacy and encryption.
  • The study highlights ML’s dual role in both exposing privacy risks and enhancing protective measures through algorithms like GANs and VAEs.
  • The authors advocate for evolving privacy metrics and advanced adversarial techniques to better balance user protection with model performance.

Machine Learning and Privacy: Addressing the Challenges and Future Directions

In the paper "When Machine Learning Meets Privacy: A Survey and Outlook", the authors provide a comprehensive review of current research at the intersection of ML and privacy, identifying key challenges and outlining possible future research directions. This review is timely given the ubiquitous deployment of ML systems across various sectors, which has amplified privacy concerns significantly.

Overview of Privacy Concerns and Current Research Efforts

The paper categorizes the interaction between ML and privacy into three main research areas:

  1. Private Machine Learning: This research line focuses on safeguarding privacy in the entire ML lifecycle — including model, training, and inference stages — against adversaries. The survey discusses various attack models such as model extraction, feature estimation, and membership inference, which pose risks to both model and data privacy. In response, researchers have leveraged techniques like encryption, differential privacy, and model aggregation as potential defenses. While the integration of differential privacy in ML ensures some degree of protection, its applicability in deep learning systems remains imperfect due to inherent complexities and limitations.
  2. Machine Learning Aided Privacy Protection: Here, ML techniques are employed to enhance privacy measures. The paper reviews ML applications in privacy risk assessment, personal privacy managers, and private data releases. Contemporary systems employ ML to predict data-sharing risks, manage privacy settings dynamically, and release data collections while ensuring privacy. Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) emerge as novel tools for generating synthetic datasets that preserve privacy without significantly compromising on utility. The applicability of ML in this space highlights the dual role of technology in both posing privacy risks and providing solutions.
  3. Machine Learning-based Privacy Attacks: The paper brings to attention the alarming potential of ML, particularly deep learning, in automating privacy attacks like re-identification and inference attacks on shared media. Consequently, adversarial machine learning techniques have been repurposed to defend against these ML-powered attacks, marking an interesting shift towards using ML to shield itself from privacy breaches.

Implications and Future Research Directions

The research landscape highlighted by the survey underscores the pressing need for new privacy metrics beyond differential privacy, especially to address the nuances in unstructured data such as text and images. Furthermore, existing privacy-preserving techniques must evolve to handle advancements in ML effectively. Continued exploration of adversarial machine learning techniques offers promising avenues for safeguarding against privacy intrusions, necessitating robust methods that balance privacy with model utility.

In terms of practical applications, protecting user privacy in ML systems demands a multifaceted approach, integrating technical solutions with regulatory and policy frameworks. Improved computational efficiency and scalability of privacy-preserving methods like homomorphic encryption are also critical for real-world deployment.

Overall, the findings and discussions in this paper render a valuable resource for researchers and practitioners aiming to bridge the gap between machine learning innovation and user privacy. As ML systems become ever more ingrained in societal infrastructures, mitigating privacy risks effectively will be paramount, making this an inherently interdisciplinary challenge calling for closer collaboration between computer science, legal, and ethical domains.