Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 97 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Log concavity and concentration of Lipschitz functions on the Boolean hypercube (2007.13108v1)

Published 26 Jul 2020 in math.PR, math.CO, and math.FA

Abstract: It is well-known that measures whose density is the form $e{-V}$ where $V$ is a uniformly convex potential on $\RRn$ attain strong concentration properties. In search of a notion of log-concavity on the discrete hypercube, we consider measures on ${-1,1}n$ whose multi-linear extension $f$ satisfies $\log \nabla2 f(x) \preceq \beta \Id$, for $\beta \geq 0$, which we refer to as $\beta$-semi-log-concave. We prove that these measures satisfy a nontrivial concentration bound, namely, any Hamming Lipchitz test function $\varphi$ satisfies $\Var_\nu[\varphi] \leq n{2-C_\beta}$ for $C_\beta>0$. As a corollary, we prove a concentration bound for measures which exhibit the so-called Rayleigh property. Namely, we show that for measures such that under any external field (or exponential tilt), the correlation between any two coordinates is non-positive, Hamming-Lipschitz functions admit nontrivial concentration.

Citations (12)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)