Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 139 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 433 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Classical and consecutive pattern avoidance in rooted forests (2005.08889v2)

Published 18 May 2020 in math.CO

Abstract: Following Anders and Archer, we say that an unordered rooted labeled forest avoids the pattern $\sigma\in\mathcal{S}k$ if in each tree, each sequence of labels along the shortest path from the root to a vertex does not contain a subsequence with the same relative order as $\sigma$. For each permutation $\sigma\in\mathcal{S}{k-2}$, we construct a bijection between $n$-vertex forests avoiding $(\sigma)(k-1)k:=\sigma(1)\cdots\sigma(k-2)(k-1)k$ and $n$-vertex forests avoiding $(\sigma)k(k-1):=\sigma(1)\cdots\sigma(k-2)k(k-1)$, giving a common generalization of results of West on permutations and Anders--Archer on forests. We further define a new object, the forest-Young diagram, which we use to extend the notion of shape-Wilf equivalence to forests. In particular, this allows us to generalize the above result to a bijection between forests avoiding ${(\sigma_1)k(k-1), (\sigma_2)k(k-1), \dots, (\sigma_\ell)k(k-1)}$ and forests avoiding ${(\sigma_1)(k-1)k, (\sigma_2)(k-1)k, \dots, (\sigma_\ell)(k-1)k}$ for $\sigma_1, \dots, \sigma_\ell \in \mathcal{S}_{k-2}$. Furthermore, we give recurrences enumerating the forests avoiding ${123\cdots k}$, ${213}$, and other sets of patterns. Finally, we extend the Goulden--Jackson cluster method to study consecutive pattern avoidance in rooted trees as defined by Anders and Archer. Using the generalized cluster method, we prove that if two length-$k$ patterns are strong-c-forest-Wilf equivalent, then up to complementation, the two patterns must start with the same number. We also prove the surprising result that the patterns $1324$ and $1423$ are strong-c-forest-Wilf equivalent, even though they are not c-Wilf equivalent with respect to permutations.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube