Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 44 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 41 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 13 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 208 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 447 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Predicting Ligand-Dissociation Energies of 3d Coordination Complexes with Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo (2001.07261v1)

Published 20 Jan 2020 in physics.chem-ph and cond-mat.str-el

Abstract: Transition metal complexes are ubiquitous in biology and chemical catalysis, yet they remain difficult to accurately describe with ab initio methods due to the presence of a large degree of dynamic electron correlation, and, in some cases, strong static correlation which results from a manifold of low-lying states. Progress has been hindered by a scarcity of high quality gas-phase experimental data, while exact ab initio predictions are usually computationally unaffordable due to the large size of the systems. In this work, we present a data set of 34 3d metal-containing complexes with gas-phase ligand-dissociation energies that have reported uncertainties of $\leq$ 2 kcal/mol. We perform all-electron phaseless auxiliary-field quantum Monte Carlo (ph-AFQMC) utilizing multi-determinant trial wavefunctions selected by a blackbox procedure. We compare the results with those from DFT with various functionals, and DLPNO-CCSD(T). We find MAE of 1.09 $\pm$ 0.28 kcal/mol for our best ph-AFQMC method, vs 2.89 kcal/mol for DLPNO-CCSD(T) and 1.57 - 3.87 kcal/mol for DFT. We find maximum errors of 2.96 $\pm$ 1.71 kcal/mol for our best ph-AFQMC method, vs 9.15 kcal/mol for DLPNO-CCSD(T) and 5.98 - 13.69 kcal/mol for DFT. The reasonable performance of several functionals is in stark contrast to the much poorer accuracy previously demonstrated for diatomics, suggesting a moderation in electron correlation due to ligand coordination. However, the unpredictably large errors for a small subset of cases with both DFT and DLPNO-CCSD(T) leave cause for concern, especially due to the unreliability of common multi-reference indicators. In contrast, the robust and, in principle, systematically improvable results of ph-AFQMC for these realistic complexes establish it as a useful tool for elucidating the electronic structure of transition metal-containing complexes and predicting their gas-phase properties.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube