Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 82 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s
GPT-5 High 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 467 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 217 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The harmonic mean $χ^2$ test to substantiate scientific findings (1911.10633v3)

Published 24 Nov 2019 in stat.ME

Abstract: Statistical methodology plays a crucial role in drug regulation. Decisions by the FDA or EMA are typically made based on multiple primary studies testing the same medical product, where the two-trials rule is the standard requirement, despite a number of shortcomings. A new approach is proposed for this task based on the (weighted) harmonic mean of the squared study-specific test statistics. Appropriate scaling ensures that, for any number of independent studies, the null distribution is a $\chi2$-distribution with one degree of freedom. This gives rise to a new method for combining one-sided $p$-values and calculating confidence intervals for the overall treatment effect. Further properties are discussed and a comparison with the two-trials rule is made, as well as with alternative research synthesis methods. An attractive feature of the new approach is that a claim of success requires each study to be convincing on its own to a certain degree depending on the overall significance level and the number of studies. A real example with 5 clinical trials investigating the effect of Carvedilol for the treatment of patients with moderate to severe heart failure patients is used to illustrate the methodology.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)