Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
167 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary Generator (1911.04127v1)

Published 11 Nov 2019 in cs.CV

Abstract: Generating temporal action proposals remains a very challenging problem, where the main issue lies in predicting precise temporal proposal boundaries and reliable action confidence in long and untrimmed real-world videos. In this paper, we propose an efficient and unified framework to generate temporal action proposals named Dense Boundary Generator (DBG), which draws inspiration from boundary-sensitive methods and implements boundary classification and action completeness regression for densely distributed proposals. In particular, the DBG consists of two modules: Temporal boundary classification (TBC) and Action-aware completeness regression (ACR). The TBC aims to provide two temporal boundary confidence maps by low-level two-stream features, while the ACR is designed to generate an action completeness score map by high-level action-aware features. Moreover, we introduce a dual stream BaseNet (DSB) to encode RGB and optical flow information, which helps to capture discriminative boundary and actionness features. Extensive experiments on popular benchmarks ActivityNet-1.3 and THUMOS14 demonstrate the superiority of DBG over the state-of-the-art proposal generator (e.g., MGG and BMN). Our code will be made available upon publication.

Citations (205)

Summary

  • The paper's main contribution is the Dense Boundary Generator, a unified framework combining temporal boundary classification and action-aware completeness regression for accurate proposal generation.
  • The methodology leverages a dual-stream BaseNet that integrates RGB and optical flow features to extract both low-level boundary cues and high-level actionness scores.
  • Experimental results on ActivityNet-1.3 and THUMOS14 demonstrate that DBG achieves superior AR and AUC metrics while reducing inference times compared to previous models.

Fast Learning of Temporal Action Proposal via Dense Boundary Generator

The paper introduces an approach termed Dense Boundary Generator (DBG), aiming at efficiently generating temporal action proposals. The challenge addressed by this work is the need for accurate temporal boundaries and reliable action confidence in extended, untrimmed video footage. The proposed framework endeavors to overcome the limitations of previous methods—both anchor-based and boundary-based—by employing a unified methodology for temporal action proposal generation that leverages densely distributed proposals.

Methodology Overview

DBG operates through two primary modules: Temporal Boundary Classification (TBC) and Action-aware Completeness Regression (ACR). TBC's role is to produce two temporal boundary confidence maps derived from low-level features, enhancing the model's ability to discern boundaries. In contrast, ACR relies on high-level features to generate action completeness score maps. These components are integrated with a dual stream BaseNet (DSB), which captures RGB and optical flow data to facilitate the extraction of distinctive boundary and actionness cues.

The innovative use of a dual stream BaseNet serves as the backbone for processing and integrating RGB and motion features at both low and high levels. This approach allows for superior feature extraction and construction of dual stream and actionness score feature sequences. The proposal feature generation (PFG) layer then transitions these features into matrices essential for subsequent regression and classification, supporting a richer and more globally context-aware feature set.

Experimental Results

The researchers conducted extensive evaluations using two prominent benchmarks: ActivityNet-1.3 and THUMOS14. The results underscore DBG’s robustness and efficacy, evidenced by superior scores in critical metrics such as AR@AN and AUC, outperforming established state-of-the-art methods like MGG and BMN. Specifically, DBG achieved an AUC of 68.23 on the validation set of ActivityNet-1.3, marking an appreciable improvement over competing models.

On THUMOS14, DBG demonstrated a consistent advantage across varying proposal numbers, substantiated by higher AR at key evaluation points, such as AR@1000 and AR@500. Additionally, in terms of computational efficiency, DBG substantially reduced inference times while maintaining high performance, positioning itself as a practical solution for real-world applications that require swift and reliable action detection.

Future Work and Implications

The paper's contributions extend beyond empirical improvements, suggesting theoretical advancements in handling temporal action proposals via dense boundary information. The proposed structure highlights the significance of global features in conjunction with localized temporal cues to achieve precise action boundary detection. This approach introduces pathways for future research focused on further optimizing action proposal frameworks for real-time video processing, potentially employing enhanced feature representations or exploring novel learning strategies.

Moreover, this research may catalyze advancements in related fields such as action recognition and semantic video understanding. The deployment of systems like DBG could enhance applications requiring rapid content identification and annotation in various domains, including security surveillance, sports analysis, and multimedia information retrieval.

With its focus on fine-grained temporal analysis and a comprehensive evaluation, DBG exemplifies a significant step forward in the evolution of video action understanding methodologies. Its integration of precise boundary prediction and completeness scoring in a unified structure provides a strong foundation for pursuing further innovations in this dynamic and impactful area of artificial intelligence research.