Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Meta-Learning with Implicit Gradients (1909.04630v1)

Published 10 Sep 2019 in cs.LG, cs.AI, math.OC, and stat.ML

Abstract: A core capability of intelligent systems is the ability to quickly learn new tasks by drawing on prior experience. Gradient (or optimization) based meta-learning has recently emerged as an effective approach for few-shot learning. In this formulation, meta-parameters are learned in the outer loop, while task-specific models are learned in the inner-loop, by using only a small amount of data from the current task. A key challenge in scaling these approaches is the need to differentiate through the inner loop learning process, which can impose considerable computational and memory burdens. By drawing upon implicit differentiation, we develop the implicit MAML algorithm, which depends only on the solution to the inner level optimization and not the path taken by the inner loop optimizer. This effectively decouples the meta-gradient computation from the choice of inner loop optimizer. As a result, our approach is agnostic to the choice of inner loop optimizer and can gracefully handle many gradient steps without vanishing gradients or memory constraints. Theoretically, we prove that implicit MAML can compute accurate meta-gradients with a memory footprint that is, up to small constant factors, no more than that which is required to compute a single inner loop gradient and at no overall increase in the total computational cost. Experimentally, we show that these benefits of implicit MAML translate into empirical gains on few-shot image recognition benchmarks.

Meta-Learning with Implicit Gradients

The paper "Meta-Learning with Implicit Gradients" by Aravind Rajeswaran, Chelsea Finn, Sham Kakade, and Sergey Levine presents a novel approach to optimization-based meta-learning that aims to alleviate the computational burdens associated with backpropagating through the inner optimization loop. This method, referred to as implicit MAML (iMAML), leverages implicit differentiation to decouple the computation of meta-gradients from the specific path taken by the inner loop optimizer. This provides significant improvements in terms of memory usage and computational scalability.

Core Contribution

The primary contribution of this work lies in its application of implicit differentiation to meta-learning, specifically through the iMAML algorithm. Implicit differentiation allows the computation of meta-gradients to depend only on the solution to the inner optimization problem and not on the optimization trajectory itself. This presents several advantages:

  • Memory Efficiency: By not needing to store the optimization path, iMAML significantly reduces the memory overhead.
  • Optimizer Agnosticism: The approach is agnostic to the choice of the inner loop optimization algorithm, thereby allowing the use of sophisticated optimization methods such as higher-order optimization techniques and even non-differentiable methods.
  • Scalability: The method can handle a large number of inner-loop optimization steps without suffering from vanishing gradients, making it suitable for larger datasets or more complex tasks.

Theoretical Foundations

The authors provide a substantial theoretical backing for iMAML, including:

  • Gradient Computation: They derive an analytical expression for the meta-gradient that only relies on the Hessian of the inner loop loss at the optimal solution, bypassing the need for explicit differentiation through the optimization path.
  • Finite-Time Guarantees: They offer the first non-asymptotic theoretical analysis of bi-level optimization in this context, proving that an ϵ\epsilon-accurate meta-gradient can be computed with O~(log(1/ϵ))\tilde{O}(\log(1/\epsilon)) gradient evaluations and using O~(1)\tilde{O}(1) memory.
  • Algorithm Efficiency: The approach's memory and computational complexities are rigorously analyzed and compared with existing methods like MAML and truncated backpropagation, demonstrating significant improvements, especially in terms of memory usage.

Numerical and Empirical Evaluation

The experimental results validate the theoretical findings and demonstrate the practical efficacy of iMAML:

  1. Meta-Gradient Accuracy: Through synthetic experiments in linear regression, the authors show that iMAML can asymptotically match the exact meta-gradient and approximate the meta-gradient more accurately than MAML with a finite number of iterations.
  2. Resource Trade-offs: In few-shot image recognition tasks on the Omniglot dataset, iMAML achieves memory and computational efficiency. Unlike MAML, iMAML's memory usage does not increase with the number of gradient steps, enabling it to run with limited resources.
  3. Benchmark Performance: When evaluated on standard few-shot learning benchmarks such as Omniglot and Mini-ImageNet, iMAML achieves competitive or superior performance compared to MAML, first-order MAML, and Reptile. Notably, iMAML with a Hessian-free optimization in the inner loop demonstrates improved accuracy, highlighting the benefits of using advanced optimization methods in meta-learning.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of iMAML extend both practically and theoretically:

  • Practical Applications: iMAML's efficiency opens up possibilities for applying meta-learning to more complex and larger-scale tasks across various domains, including reinforcement learning, structured prediction, and other machine learning paradigms requiring rapid adaptation.
  • Theoretical Insights: The non-asymptotic analysis provided by the authors lays a strong foundation for future research in optimization-based meta-learning, focusing on more stringent theoretical analyses and potential improvements in implicit differentiation techniques.

Future developments could explore:

  • Adaptation of Different Regularizers: Beyond 2\ell_2 regularization, exploring more flexible and task-specific regularizers to further enhance the adaptability of meta-learned models.
  • Broader Inner Loop Algorithms: Extending the framework to accommodate a wider array of inner optimization algorithms, including non-convex and non-differentiable methods, to broaden the applicability and robustness of meta-learning solutions.
  • Applications in Different Learning Paradigms: Investigating the utility of iMAML in various learning settings like adversarial learning, dynamic programming, and model-based optimization to harness the power of implicit gradients in diverse scenarios.

Overall, this paper presents a substantial advancement in meta-learning, providing a more efficient and scalable method that paves the way for significant practical applications and further theoretical developments in the field.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Aravind Rajeswaran (42 papers)
  2. Chelsea Finn (264 papers)
  3. Sham Kakade (84 papers)
  4. Sergey Levine (531 papers)
Citations (796)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com