Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 97 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 175 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Yule's "nonsense correlation" solved: Part II (1909.02546v5)

Published 5 Sep 2019 in math.ST and stat.TH

Abstract: In 1926, G. Udny Yule considered the following: given a sequence of pairs of random variables ${X_k,Y_k }$ ($k=1,2, \ldots, n$), and letting $X_i = S_i$ and $Y_ i= S'i$ where $S_i$ and $S'_i$ are the partial sums of two independent random walks, what is the distribution of the empirical correlation coefficient \begin{equation*} \rho_n = \frac{\sum{i=1}n S_i S\prime_i - \frac{1}{n}(\sum_{i=1}n S_i)(\sum_{i=1}n S\prime_i)}{\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}n S2_i - \frac{1}{n}(\sum_{i=1}n S_i)2}\sqrt{\sum_{i=1}n (S\prime_i)2 - \frac{1}{n}(\sum_{i=1}n S\prime_i)2}}? \end{equation*} Yule empirically observed the distribution of this statistic to be heavily dispersed and frequently large in absolute value, leading him to call it "nonsense correlation." This unexpected finding led to his formulation of two concrete questions, each of which would remain open for more than ninety years: (i) Find (analytically) the variance of $\rho_n$ as $n \rightarrow \infty$ and (ii): Find (analytically) the higher order moments and the density of $\rho_n$ as $n \rightarrow \infty$. In 2017, Ernst, Shepp, and Wyner considered the empirical correlation coefficient \begin{equation*} \rho:= \frac{\int_01W_1(t)W_2(t) dt - \int_01W_1(t) dt \int_01 W_2(t) dt}{\sqrt{\int_01 W2_1(t) dt - (\int_01W_1(t) dt)2} \sqrt{\int_01 W2_2(t) dt - (\int_01W_2(t) dt)2}}\end{equation*} of two independent Wiener processes $W_1,W_2$, the limit to which $\rho_n$ converges weakly, as was first shown by Phillips (1986). Using tools from integral equation theory, Ernst et al. (2017) closed question (i) by explicitly calculating the second moment of $\rho$ to be .240522. This paper begins where Ernst et al. (2017) leaves off. We succeed in closing question (ii) by explicitly calculating all moments of $\rho$ (up to order 16).

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.