Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 97 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 100 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 464 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 186 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Revealing Hidden Substructures in the $M_{BH}$-$σ$ Diagram, and Refining the Bend in the $L$-$σ$ Relation (1908.06838v3)

Published 19 Aug 2019 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: Using 145 early- and late-type galaxies (ETGs and LTGs) with directly-measured super-massive black hole masses, $M_{BH}$, we build upon our previous discoveries that: (i) LTGs, most of which have been alleged to contain a pseudobulge, follow the relation $M_{BH}\propto\,M_{,sph}{2.16\pm0.32}$; and (ii) the ETG relation $M_{BH}\propto\,M_{,sph}{1.27\pm0.07}$ is an artifact of ETGs with/without disks following parallel $M_{BH}\propto\,M_{*,sph}{1.9\pm0.2}$ relations which are offset by an order of magnitude in the $M_{BH}$-direction. Here, we searched for substructure in the $M_{BH}$--(central velocity dispersion, $\sigma$) diagram using our recently published, multi-component, galaxy decompositions; investigating divisions based on the presence of a depleted stellar core (major dry-merger), a disk (minor wet/dry-merger, gas accretion), or a bar (evolved unstable disk). The S\'ersic and core-S\'ersic galaxies define two distinct relations: $M_{BH}\propto\sigma{5.75\pm0.34}$ and $M_{BH}\propto\sigma{8.64\pm1.10}$, with $\Delta_{rms|BH}=0.55$ and $0.46$~dex, respectively. We also report on the consistency with the slopes and bends in the galaxy luminosity ($L$)--$\sigma$ relation due to S\'ersic and core-S\'ersic ETGs, and LTGs which all have S\'ersic light-profiles. Two distinct relations (superficially) reappear in the $M_{BH}$--$\sigma$ diagram upon separating galaxies with/without a disk (primarily for the ETG sample), while we find no significant offset between barred and non-barred galaxies, nor between galaxies with/without active galactic nuclei. We also address selection biases purported to affect the scaling relations for dynamically-measured $M_{BH}$ samples. Our new, (morphological type)-dependent, $M_{BH}$--$\sigma$ relations more precisely estimate $M_{BH}$ in other galaxies, and hold implications for galaxy/black hole co-evolution theories, and simulations. (Abridged)

Citations (44)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.