A Noninequality for the Fractional Gradient (1906.05541v2)
Abstract: In this paper we give a streamlined proof of an inequality recently obtained by the author: For every $\alpha \in (0,1)$ there exists a constant $C=C(\alpha,d)>0$ such that \begin{align*} |u|{L{d/(d-\alpha),1}(\mathbb{R}d)} \leq C | D\alpha u|{L1(\mathbb{R}d;\mathbb{R}d)} \end{align*} for all $u \in Lq(\mathbb{R}d)$ for some $1 \leq q<d/(1-\alpha)$ such that $D\alpha u:=\nabla I_{1-\alpha} u \in L1(\mathbb{R}d;\mathbb{R}d)$. We also give a counterexample which shows that in contrast to the case $\alpha =1$, the fractional gradient does not admit an $L1$ trace inequality, i.e. $| D\alpha u|{L1(\mathbb{R}d;\mathbb{R}d)}$ cannot control the integral of $u$ with respect to the Hausdorff content $\mathcal{H}{d-\alpha}\infty$. The main substance of this counterexample is a result of interest in its own right, that even a weak-type estimate for the Riesz transforms fails on the space $L1(\mathcal{H}{d-\beta}_\infty)$, $\beta \in [1,d)$. It is an open question whether this failure of a weak-type estimate for the Riesz transforms extends to $\beta \in (0,1)$.
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.