Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

On the equivalence between graph isomorphism testing and function approximation with GNNs (1905.12560v2)

Published 29 May 2019 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved much success on graph-structured data. In light of this, there have been increasing interests in studying their expressive power. One line of work studies the capability of GNNs to approximate permutation-invariant functions on graphs, and another focuses on the their power as tests for graph isomorphism. Our work connects these two perspectives and proves their equivalence. We further develop a framework of the expressive power of GNNs that incorporates both of these viewpoints using the language of sigma-algebra, through which we compare the expressive power of different types of GNNs together with other graph isomorphism tests. In particular, we prove that the second-order Invariant Graph Network fails to distinguish non-isomorphic regular graphs with the same degree. Then, we extend it to a new architecture, Ring-GNN, which succeeds in distinguishing these graphs and achieves good performances on real-world datasets.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Zhengdao Chen (12 papers)
  2. Soledad Villar (45 papers)
  3. Lei Chen (485 papers)
  4. Joan Bruna (119 papers)
Citations (265)

Summary

On the Equivalence between Graph Isomorphism Testing and Function Approximation with GNNs

The paper "On the Equivalence between Graph Isomorphism Testing and Function Approximation with GNNs" addresses a pivotal intersection between the expressive capabilities of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) concerning graph isomorphism testing and function approximation on permutation-invariant functions. The authors, Zhengdao Chen, Soledad Villar, Lei Chen, and Joan Bruna from New York University, delve into the interconnected nature of these perspectives and propose a unified framework to assess the expressive power of GNNs.

Overview

GNNs have garnered significant attention for processing graph-structured data across various disciplines, including computational biology and social sciences, due to their intrinsic symmetry considerations, such as invariance and equivariance. These models' power is often evaluated based on their ability to approximate functions on graphs and their effectiveness in graph isomorphism testing. The work bridges these viewpoints, establishing their theoretical equivalence.

Key Contributions

The paper makes several key contributions:

  1. Equivalence Proof: The authors prove the equivalence between the ability of GNNs to distinguish between non-isomorphic graphs and their capability to approximate any (continuous) permutation-invariant function.
  2. Expressive Power through Sigma-Algebras: By employing sigma-algebra, the authors propose a novel framework to characterize and compare the expressive power of different GNN architectures and related graph isomorphism tests.
  3. Ring-GNN Architecture: They introduce the Ring-GNN, an extension of the second-order Invariant Graph Network (2-IGN) capable of distinguishing regular graphs where 2-IGN fails. Ring-GNN achieves this by utilizing a ring of invariant matrices under addition and multiplication.
  4. Theoretical and Empirical Analysis: A theoretical analysis highlights the limitations of 2-IGN in distinguishing certain graph structures, substantiated by empirical results on synthetic and real-world datasets.

Theoretical Framework and Implications

The theoretical underpinning connects the expressive power of GNNs with classical concepts in function approximation and graph isomorphism testing. This equivalence implies that advancing one aspect, such as function approximation capabilities, inherently benefits graph isomorphism tasks and vice versa. By leveraging the sigma-algebra framework, the paper facilitates a systematic comparison of the power of various GNN models, enhancing our understanding of GNN capabilities.

Experimental Findings

In practical terms, the introduction of Ring-GNN shows promise by solving tasks that originally proved challenging for other GNN architectures. The ability to distinguish between non-isomorphic regular graphs manifests practically through improved model performance in classification tasks, such as with the Circular Skip Link (CSL) graphs. Moreover, while Ring-GNN demonstrates robust performance in synthetic tasks, its real-world dataset results indicate that including matrix operations (like those in the Ring-GNN) does not always guarantee superior performance over simpler models like the Graph Isomorphism Network (GIN), highlighting the trade-off between model complexity and practical efficacy.

Future Directions

The work sets a foundation for numerous future research directions. The developed framework can extend to further evaluate GNN architectures, considering broader functional classes and graph invariance properties. Exploring the operational role of the ring structures in GNNs' performance on different tasks and their potential applications in other domains also presents fruitful avenues for further investigation.

In conclusion, this paper presents a well-founded theoretical convergence between graph isomorphism testing and function approximation within the context of GNNs, broadening the horizon for developing more powerful and efficient network architectures. The Ring-GNN, as a practical manifestation of these findings, potentially heralds a significant step in graph-related machine learning research, embodying a more nuanced approach to understanding and utilizing graph structures.