Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 84 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 189 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Star cluster formation in cosmological simulations. III. Dynamical and chemical evolution (1810.11036v2)

Published 25 Oct 2018 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: In previous papers of this series, we developed a new algorithm for modeling the formation of star clusters in galaxy formation simulations. Here we investigate how dissolution of bound star clusters affects the shape of the cluster mass function and the metallicity distribution of surviving clusters. Cluster evolution includes the loss of stars that become unbound due to tidal disruption as well as mass-loss due to stellar evolution. We calculate the tidal tensor along cluster trajectories and use it to estimate the instantaneous mass-loss rate. The typical tidal tensor exhibits large variations on a time-scale of $\sim100$~Myr, with maximum eigenvalue of $107$~Gyr${-2}$, and median value of $104$~Gyr${-2}$ for the first Gyr after cluster formation. As a result of dynamical disruption, at the final available output of our simulations at redshift $z\approx1.5$, the cluster mass function has an approximately log-normal shape peaked at $\sim10{4.3}M_\odot$. Extrapolation of the disruption to $z=0$ results in too many low-mass clusters compared to the observed Galactic globular clusters (GCs). Over 70\% of GC candidates are completely disrupted before the present; only 10\% of the total GC candidate mass remains in surviving clusters. The total mass of surviving clusters at $z=0$ varies from run to run in the range $(2-6)\times107M_\odot$, consistent with the observed mass of GC systems in Milky Way-sized galaxies. The metallicity distributions of all massive star clusters and of the surviving GCs have similar shapes but different normalization because of cluster disruption. The model produces a larger fraction of very metal-poor clusters than observed. A robust prediction of the model is the age-metallicity relation, in which metal-rich clusters are systematically younger than metal-poor clusters by up to 3~Gyr.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)