Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Sparsified SGD with Memory (1809.07599v2)

Published 20 Sep 2018 in cs.LG, cs.DC, cs.DS, and stat.ML

Abstract: Huge scale machine learning problems are nowadays tackled by distributed optimization algorithms, i.e. algorithms that leverage the compute power of many devices for training. The communication overhead is a key bottleneck that hinders perfect scalability. Various recent works proposed to use quantization or sparsification techniques to reduce the amount of data that needs to be communicated, for instance by only sending the most significant entries of the stochastic gradient (top-k sparsification). Whilst such schemes showed very promising performance in practice, they have eluded theoretical analysis so far. In this work we analyze Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) with k-sparsification or compression (for instance top-k or random-k) and show that this scheme converges at the same rate as vanilla SGD when equipped with error compensation (keeping track of accumulated errors in memory). That is, communication can be reduced by a factor of the dimension of the problem (sometimes even more) whilst still converging at the same rate. We present numerical experiments to illustrate the theoretical findings and the better scalability for distributed applications.

Sparsified SGD with Memory: A Comprehensive Overview

The paper "Sparsified SGD with Memory" by Sebastian U. Stich, Jean-Baptiste Cordonnier, and Martin Jaggi presents a novel analysis of sparsified stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms, focusing on their application to distributed optimization tasks. The primary contribution is the introduction and theoretical analysis of an SGD variant that integrates error compensation to maintain convergence rates despite aggressive gradient sparsification. This approach has significant implications for reducing the communication overhead in large-scale distributed machine learning tasks.

Summary of Key Contributions

The paper addresses the communication bottleneck inherent in distributed training of machine learning models. Traditional SGD methods, while computationally efficient, suffer from high communication costs due to the need to transmit dense gradient vectors across distributed systems. This paper proposes an improvement by employing sparsification techniques, where only a subset of the gradient entries is communicated, significantly reducing the data transmitted.

Main Contributions:

  1. Sparsified SGD with Error Compensation:
    • The authors introduce an SGD variant where gradients are sparsified before communication. They introduce the concept of using a memory vector to store and compensate for the accumulated errors resulting from sparsification. This ensures that the convergence rate of the sparsified SGD matches that of the vanilla SGD, even with a reduced communication load.
  2. Theoretical Analysis and Convergence Proof:
    • The paper provides a detailed convergence rate analysis for the proposed method. Specifically, it proves that the sparsified SGD with memory (known as Mem-SGD) converges at the same rate as the vanilla SGD for appropriately chosen step sizes.
    • Theoretical results demonstrate that communication can be reduced by a factor proportional to the problem's dimension without sacrificing convergence speed.
  3. Numerical Experiments:
    • Two sets of experiments are presented: performance evaluation against traditional SGD methods and an implementation for parallel scenarios.
    • Empirical results verify the theoretical findings, highlighting the efficiency and scalability of the proposed approach.

Technical Details

Sparsification Operators:

The paper utilizes two main types of sparsification operators, top-k and random-k: - Top-k Sparsification: This operator selects the gradient entries with the largest magnitudes. - Random-k Sparsification: This operator selects gradient entries at random.

Both operators ensure that only k out of d gradient entries are communicated, drastically reducing the communication cost. The authors also discuss the broader class of contraction operators which allow further flexibility in gradient sparsification.

Error Compensation Mechanism:

A critical aspect of the proposed method is the memory vector m_t, which tracks the sum of the suppressed gradient information. The gradients at each step are corrected using this memory vector, ensuring that significant gradient components are not permanently lost due to sparsification. The update rules are:

1
2
3
x_{t+1} := x_t - g_t
g_t := comp_k(m_t + η_t ∇f_{i_t}(x_t))
m_{t+1} := m_t + η_t ∇f_{i_t}(x_t) - g_t

Convergence Analysis:

The authors prove that for certain parameter choices, Mem-SGD converges at an optimal rate:

1
E[f(𝑥̄_T)] - f* = O(G^2/(μT)) + O((d^2 G^2 κ)/(k^2 μ T^2)) + O((d^3 G^2)/(k^3 μ T^3))
where 𝑥̄_T is the averaged iterate, G bounds the gradient, μ is the strong convexity parameter, κ denotes the condition number, and T is the number of iterations. This rate matches the standard SGD for T = Ω(d κ^(1/2)/k).

Practical Implications and Future Directions

Practical Implications:

  1. Communication Efficiency:
    • The demonstrated reduction in communication requirements makes Mem-SGD suitable for distributed training environments, particularly those constrained by network bandwidth.
  2. Scalability:
    • The numerical experiments confirm that the method scales well in parallel implementations, making it applicable to multi-core and multi-node systems without compromising on convergence speed.

Future Directions:

The paper opens several avenues for future research:

  1. Extending to Non-Convex Settings:
    • While the current analysis focuses on convex problems, extending the framework to non-convex settings, such as deep neural networks, would be valuable.
  2. Asynchronous Implementations:
    • Investigating the convergence behavior in asynchronous distributed environments could further enhance the method’s applicability.
  3. Adaptive Sparsification:
    • Developing adaptive schemes that dynamically adjust the sparsification level based on the current state of the optimization process could improve robustness and performance.

Conclusion

The paper "Sparsified SGD with Memory" provides a significant advancement in the field of distributed optimization. By incorporating error compensation into a sparsified SGD framework, the authors offer a method that reduces communication costs while retaining theoretical guarantees of convergence. This work has practical relevance for large-scale machine learning applications and lays the groundwork for further exploration in efficient distributed training algorithms.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Sebastian U. Stich (66 papers)
  2. Jean-Baptiste Cordonnier (8 papers)
  3. Martin Jaggi (155 papers)
Citations (709)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com