Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 54 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 50 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 182 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 466 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 40 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Extracting distribution parameters from multiple uncertain observations with selection biases (1809.02063v2)

Published 6 Sep 2018 in physics.data-an and astro-ph.HE

Abstract: We derive a Bayesian framework for incorporating selection effects into population analyses. We allow for both measurement uncertainty in individual measurements and, crucially, for selection biases on the population of measurements, and show how to extract the parameters of the underlying distribution based on a set of observations sampled from this distribution. We illustrate the performance of this framework with an example from gravitational-wave astrophysics, demonstrating that the mass ratio distribution of merging compact-object binaries can be extracted from Malmquist-biased observations with substantial measurement uncertainty.

Citations (259)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper introduces a Bayesian framework that integrates measurement uncertainties and selection biases for accurate extraction of population parameters.
  • Using both bottom-up and top-down derivations, the method forms consistent likelihood functions applicable to astrophysical surveys and gravitational-wave data.
  • The approach effectively corrects Malmquist bias, paving the way for improved population inferences in studies with high observational uncertainties.

Extracting Distribution Parameters from Multiple Uncertain Observations with Selection Biases

The paper presents a Bayesian framework designed to incorporate selection effects into population analyses. The paper particularly addresses the challenges of extracting distribution parameters from a sample influenced by measurement uncertainties and selection biases. This paradigm is critical in fields such as gravitational-wave astrophysics, where observational data often suffer from Malmquist bias—a tendency to over-sample brighter sources due to limitations in detection thresholds.

Methodology

The proposed framework employs a hierarchical modeling approach that corrects for biases in the population of observations. Two derivations are offered: a bottom-up approach and a top-down methodology. The bottom-up derivation starts from a basic population model and incorporates complexities such as measurement uncertainties and selection effects step-by-step. This involves a Bayesian inference formulation where selection biases and measurement uncertainties are captured within the likelihood framework. It provides a strategy to obtain the posterior probability of population parameters by integrating real measurements with population priors corrected for selection biases.

In contrast, the top-down derivation considers the complete population, partitioning into observable and non-observable components. This derivation leads to a likelihood function that acknowledges the selected subset of detectable events and adjusts for the non-observed data. Both approaches converge, demonstrating compatibility and robustness in estimating population distribution parameters.

Applications and Results

The framework is illustrated through applications in astrophysics. A classic example in measuring a luminosity function from a flux-limited survey is showcased, affirming the method's efficacy in dealing with common astrophysical data limitations. Specific performance assessments include estimations for gravitational-wave data, where researchers focus on variables such as the mass ratio of merging binary neutron stars. The analysis reveals that upwards of a thousand observations with high signal-to-noise ratios are necessary to discern mass ratio distributions effectively, which is a feasible prospect with third-generation gravitational-wave detectors.

The implementation of these methods involves using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo technique to sample the unobserved population, allowing the framework to cater to computational scenarios where analytical solutions are impractical. The paper highlights not just the numerical accuracy achieved but also draws attention to essential nuances in parameter estimation, such as the possible introduction of biases when traditional methods overlook selection effects.

Implications and Future Prospects

Practical implications of this research extend to improving the accuracy and reliability of parameter estimation in population studies across various scientific domains. The ability to account for selection biases inherently enables a more nuanced understanding of the underlying population characteristics, thereby refining astrophysical models.

Future prospects of such methodologies implicate further refinement of selection models and likelihood functions, accounting for increasingly complex astrophysical phenomena. With the advent of newer, more powerful observational tools, expanding the Bayesian framework to accommodate multi-dimensional parameter spaces and convoluted selection scenarios will be crucial. This paper lays a foundation for improving demographic inferences in astrophysical and similar contexts where observational data are imperfect and biased.

This paper significantly contributes to the domain of population studies where biases and uncertainties are intrinsic to the observational process. It advances methods in both theoretical understanding and practical application, offering a robust toolset for contemporary and future explorations in astrophysics and various applications requiring complex inference under uncertainty.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.