Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
125 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Temporal Information Extraction by Predicting Relative Time-lines (1808.09401v2)

Published 28 Aug 2018 in cs.CL

Abstract: The current leading paradigm for temporal information extraction from text consists of three phases: (1) recognition of events and temporal expressions, (2) recognition of temporal relations among them, and (3) time-line construction from the temporal relations. In contrast to the first two phases, the last phase, time-line construction, received little attention and is the focus of this work. In this paper, we propose a new method to construct a linear time-line from a set of (extracted) temporal relations. But more importantly, we propose a novel paradigm in which we directly predict start and end-points for events from the text, constituting a time-line without going through the intermediate step of prediction of temporal relations as in earlier work. Within this paradigm, we propose two models that predict in linear complexity, and a new training loss using TimeML-style annotations, yielding promising results.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. James F Allen. 1990. Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Readings in Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems, pages 361–372.
  2. Steven Bethard. 2013. ClearTK-TimeML: A minimalist approach to tempeval 2013. In Proceedings of SemEval, volume 2, pages 10–14. ACL.
  3. Timelines from text: Identification of syntactic temporal relations. In Proceedings of ICSC, pages 11–18.
  4. Semeval-2016 task 12: Clinical tempeval. In Proceedings of SemEval, pages 1052–1062. ACL.
  5. SemEval-2017 Task 12: Clinical TempEval. In Proceedings of SemEval, pages 565–572. ACL.
  6. An annotation framework for dense event ordering. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 501–506. ACL.
  7. Dense event ordering with a multi-pass architecture. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2:273–284.
  8. Nathanael Chambers and Dan Jurafsky. 2008. Jointly combining implicit constraints improves temporal ordering. In Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 698–706. ACL.
  9. Fei Cheng and Yusuke Miyao. 2017. Classifying temporal relations by bidirectional LSTM over dependency paths. In Proceedings of ACL, volume 2, pages 1–6. ACL.
  10. Pascal Denis and Philippe Muller. 2011. Predicting globally-coherent temporal structures from texts via endpoint inference and graph decomposition. In Proceedings of IJCAI, pages 1788–1793.
  11. Leon RA Derczynski. 2017. Automatically Ordering Events and Times in Text, volume 677. Springer.
  12. Neural temporal relation extraction. In Proceedings of EACL, volume 2, pages 746–751.
  13. Joint inference for event timeline construction. In Proceedings of EMNLP-CoNLL, pages 677–687. ACL.
  14. Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8):1735–1780.
  15. Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980.
  16. Stacking approach to temporal relation classification. Journal of Natural Language Processing, 22(3):171–196.
  17. Artuur Leeuwenberg and Marie-Francine Moens. 2017. Structured learning for temporal relation extraction from clinical records. In Proceedings of EACL, volume 1, pages 1150–1158. ACL.
  18. Multilayered temporal modeling for the clinical domain. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 23(2):387–395.
  19. Machine learning of temporal relations. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL, pages 753–760. ACL.
  20. Paramita Mirza and Sara Tonelli. 2016. CATENA : Causal and temporal relation extraction from natural language texts. Proceedings of COLING, pages 64–75.
  21. Nelson Morgan and Hervé Bourlard. 1990. Generalization and parameter estimation in feedforward nets: Some experiments. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems.
  22. A structured learning approach to temporal relation extraction. Proceedings of EMNLP, pages 1038–1048.
  23. A multi-axis annotation scheme for event temporal relations. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 1318–1328. ACL.
  24. The TIMEBANK Corpus. Natural Language Processing and Information Systems, 4592:647–656.
  25. Temporal anchoring of events for the timebank corpus. Proceedings of ACL, pages 2195–2204.
  26. Event time extraction with a decision tree of neural classifiers. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6:77–89.
  27. Neural architecture for temporal relation extraction: A Bi-LSTM approach for detecting narrative containers. In Proceedings of ACL, pages 224–230.
  28. Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pages 173–180. ACL.
  29. Naushad UzZaman and James F. Allen. 2011. Temporal evaluation. In Proceedings of ACL, HLT ’11, pages 351–356, Stroudsburg, PA, USA. ACL.
  30. Semeval-2013 task 1: Tempeval-3: Evaluating time expressions, events, and temporal relations. Second joint conference on lexical and computational semantics (* SEM), 2:1–9.
  31. Constraint propagation algorithms for temporal reasoning: A revised report. In Readings in Qualitative Reasoning about Physical Systems, pages 373–381. Elsevier.
  32. Jointly identifying temporal relations with markov logic. In Proceedings of ACL-IJCNLP, pages 405–413. ACL.
Citations (39)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.