Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 42 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 36 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 108 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 220 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 473 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Stars of Empty Simplices (1808.08734v2)

Published 27 Aug 2018 in math.PR

Abstract: Let $X={x_1,\ldots,x_n} \subset \mathbb Rd$ be an $n$-element point set in general position. For a $k$-element subset ${x_{i_1},\ldots,x_{i_k}} \subset X$ let the degree ${\rm deg}k(x{i_1},\ldots,x_{i_k})$ be the number of empty simplices ${x_{i_1},\ldots,x_{i_{d+1}}} \subset X$ containing no other point of $X$. The $k$-degree of the set $X$, denoted ${\rm deg}_k(X)$, is defined as the maximum degree over all $k$-element subset of $X$. We show that if $X$ is a random point set consisting of $n$ independently and uniformly chosen points from a compact set $K$ then ${\rm deg}_d(X)=\Theta(n)$, improving results previously obtained by B\'ar\'any, Marckert and Reitzner [Many empty triangles have a common edge, Discrete Comput. Geom., 2013] and Temesvari [Moments of the maximal number of empty simplices of a random point set, Discrete Comput. Geom., 2018] and giving the correct order of magnitude with a significantly simpler proof. Furthermore, we investigate ${\rm deg}_k(X)$. In the case $k=1$ we prove that ${\rm deg}_1(X)=\Theta(n{d-1})$.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.