Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 89 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 48 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 211 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 459 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Search for anomalous alignments of structures in Planck data using Minkowski Tensors (1807.01306v2)

Published 3 Jul 2018 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: Minkowski Tensors are tensorial generalizations of the scalar Minkowski Functionals. Due to their tensorial nature they contain additional morphological information of structures, in particular about shape and alignment, in comparison to the scalar Minkowski functionals. They have recently been used [29] to study the statistical isotropy of temperature and E mode data from the Planck satellite. The calculation in [29] relied on stereographic projection of the fields to extract the shape and alignment information. In this work, we calculate Minkowski Tensors directly on the sphere and compute the net alignment in the data, based on a recent work that extends the definition of Minkowski Tensors to random fields on curved spaces. This method circumvents numerical errors that can be introduced by the stereographic projection. We compare the resulting net alignment parameter values obtained from the frequency coadded CMB temperature data cleaned by the SMICA pipeline, to those obtained from simulations that include instrumental beam effects and residual foreground and noise. We find very good agreement between the two within $\approx$ 1$\sigma$ . We further compare the alignments obtained from the beam-convolved CMB maps at individual Planck frequencies to those in the corresponding simulations. We find no significant difference between observed data and simulations across all Planck frequencies, except for the 30 GHz channel. For the 30 GHz channel we find $\approx$ 2$\sigma$ difference between the data and the simulations. This mild disagreement most likely originates from inaccurate estimation of the instrumental beam at 30 GHz.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.