Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 83 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 174 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 462 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Symmetric Informationally Complete Measurements Identify the Irreducible Difference between Classical and Quantum Systems (1805.08721v4)

Published 22 May 2018 in quant-ph

Abstract: We describe a general procedure for associating a minimal informationally-complete quantum measurement (or MIC) and a set of linearly independent post-measurement quantum states with a purely probabilistic representation of the Born Rule. Such representations are motivated by QBism, where the Born Rule is understood as a consistency condition between probabilities assigned to the outcomes of one experiment in terms of the probabilities assigned to the outcomes of other experiments. In this setting, the difference between quantum and classical physics is the way their physical assumptions augment bare probability theory: Classical physics corresponds to a trivial augmentation -- one just applies the Law of Total Probability (LTP) between the scenarios -- while quantum theory makes use of the Born Rule expressed in one or another of the forms of our general procedure. To mark the irreducible difference between quantum and classical, one should seek the representations that minimize the disparity between the expressions. We prove that the representation of the Born Rule obtained from a symmetric informationally-complete measurement (or SIC) minimizes this distinction in at least two senses -- the first to do with unitarily invariant distance measures between the rules, and the second to do with available volume in a reference probability simplex (roughly speaking a new kind of uncertainty principle). Both of these arise from a significant majorization result. This work complements recent studies in quantum computation where the deviation of the Born Rule from the LTP is measured in terms of negativity of Wigner functions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (38)
  1. R. P. Feynman, “Simulating Physics with Computers,” Int. J. Theo. Phys. 21, 467 (1982).
  2. V. Veitch, S. A. H. Mousavian, D. Gottesman and J. Emerson, “The resource theory of stabilizer computation,” New J. Phys. 16, 013009 (2014), arXiv:1307.7171 [].
  3. M. Howard, J. Wallman, V. Veitch and J. Emerson, “Contextuality supplies the ‘magic’ for quantum computation,” Nature 510, 351 (2014), arXiv:1401.4174 [].
  4. N. Delfosse, P. A. Guerin, J. Bian, and R. Raussendorf, “Contextuality and Wigner function negativity in quantum computation on rebits,” Phys. Rev. X 5, 021003 (2015), arXiv:1409.5170 [].
  5. H. Pashayan, J. J. Wallman, and S. D. Bartlett, “Estimating outcome probabilities of quantum circuits using quasiprobabilities,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 070501 (2015), arXiv:1503.07525 [].
  6. B. C. Stacey, “SIC-POVMs and compatibility among quantum states,” Mathematics 4, 36 (2016).
  7. H. Zhu, “Quasiprobability representations of quantum mechanics with minimal negativity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 120404 (2016), arXiv:1604.06974 [].
  8. J. B. DeBrota and C. A. Fuchs, “Negativity bounds for Weyl–Heisenberg quasiprobability representations,” Found. Phys. 47, 1009 (2017), arXiv:1703.08272 [].
  9. M. Howard and E. T. Campbell, “Application of a resource theory for magic states to fault-tolerant quantum computing,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 090501 (2017).
  10. R. Raussendorf, D. E. Browne, N. Delfosse, C. Okay, and B.-V. Juan, “Contextuality and Wigner-function negativity in qubit quantum computation,” Phys. Rev. A 95, 052334 (2017), arXiv:1511.08506 [].
  11. L. Kocia and P. Love, “Discrete Wigner formalism for qubits and non-contextuality of Clifford gates on qubit stabilizer states,” Entropy 19, 353 (2017), arXiv:1705.08869 [].
  12. C. A. Fuchs and R. Schack, “Quantum-Bayesian coherence,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 1693 (2013).
  13. C. A. Fuchs and B. C. Stacey, “QBism: Quantum Theory as a Hero’s Handbook,” in Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi,” Course 197 – Foundations of Quantum Physics (Italian Physical Society, 2019), arXiv:1612.07308 [].
  14. E. Prugovečki, “Information-Theoretical Aspects of Quantum Measurements,” Int. J. Theo. Phys. 16, 321 (1977).
  15. J. M. Renes, R. Blume-Kohout, A. J. Scott and C. M. Caves, “Symmetric informationally complete quantum measurements,” J. Math. Phys. 45, 2171 (2004), arXiv:quant-ph/0310075 [].
  16. A. J. Scott and M. Grassl, “Symmetric informationally complete positive-operator-valued measures: A new computer study,” J. Math. Phys. 51, 042203 (2010).
  17. M. Appleby, H. B. Dang and C. A. Fuchs, “Symmetric informationally-complete quantum states as analogues to orthonormal bases and minimum-uncertainty states,” Entropy 16, 1484 (2014).
  18. M. Appleby, S. Flammia, G. McConnell and J. Yard, “Generating ray class fields of real quadratic fields via complex equiangular lines,” arXiv:1604.06098 [] (2016).
  19. M. Appleby, T.-Y. Chien, S. Flammia and S. Waldron, “Constructing exact symmetric informationally complete measurements from numerical solutions,” arXiv:1703.05981 [] (2017).
  20. A. J. Scott, “SICs: Extending the list of solutions,” arXiv:1703.03993 [] (2017).
  21. M. Grassl and A. J. Scott, “Fibonacci–Lucas SIC-POVMs,” arXiv:1707.02944 [] (2017).
  22. C. A. Fuchs, M. C. Hoang and B. C. Stacey, “The SIC question: History and state of play,” Axioms 6, 21 (2017).
  23. B. C. Stacey, “Sporadic SICs and the Normed Division Algebras,” Found. Phys. 47 pp. 1060–64 (2017), arXiv:1605.01426 [].
  24. T. Durt, C. Kurtsiefer, A. Lamas-Linares and A. Ling, “Wigner Tomography of Two-Qubit States and Quantum Cryptography,” Phys. Rev. A, 78, 042338 (2008).
  25. Z. E. D. Medendorp, F. A. Torres-Ruiz, L. K. Shalm, G. N. M. Tabia, C. A. Fuchs and A. M. Steinberg, “Experimental characterization of qutrits using symmetric, informationally complete positive operator-valued measures,” Phys. Rev. A 83, 051801 (2011), arXiv:1006.4905 [].
  26. N. Bent, H. Qassim, A. A. Tahir, D. Sych, G. Leuchs, L. L. Sánchez-Soto, E. Karimi, and R. W. Boyd, “Experimental Realization of Quantum Tomography of Photonic Qudits via Symmetric Informationally Complete Positive Operator-Valued Measures,” Phys. Rev. X 5, 041006 (2015).
  27. Z. Hou, J.-F. Tang, J. Shang, H. Zhu, J. Li, Y. Yuan, K.-D. Wu, G.-Y. Xiang, C.-F. Li, and G.-C. Guo, “Deterministic realization of collective measurements via photonic quantum walks,” Nat. Commun. 9, 1414 (2018), arXiv:1710.10045 [].
  28. R. P. Feynman, “Negative Probabilities,” in Quantum Implications: Essays in Honour of David Bohm, edited by F. D. Peat and H. Basil, (Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd., 1987), pp. 235–248.
  29. C. A. Fuchs, “Notwithstanding Bohr, the Reasons for QBism,” Mind and Matter 15, 245 (2017), arXiv:1705.03483 [].
  30. M. Appleby, C. A. Fuchs, B. C. Stacey and H. Zhu, “Introducing the qplex: A novel arena for quantum theory,” Eur. Phys. J. D 71, 197 (2017).
  31. J. van de Wetering, “Quantum Theory is a Quasi-stochastic Process Theory,” in Proceedings 14th International Conference on Quantum Physics and Logic, edited by B. Coecke and A. Kissinger (Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science 266, 2018), pp. 179–196.
  32. C. Ferrie and J. Emerson, “Framed Hilbert space: Hanging the quasi-probability pictures of quantum theory,” New. J. Phys. 11, 063040 (2009).
  33. C. A. Fuchs, “Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Information (and only a little more),” in Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations, edited by A. Khrennikov (Växjö University Press, Växjö, Sweden, 2002), pp. 463–543, arXiv:quant-ph/0205039 [].
  34. C. M. Caves, “Measures and volumes for spheres, the probability simplex, projective Hilbert space, and density operators,” Internal Reports (2001). http://info.phys.unm.edu/~caves/reports/measures.pdf
  35. A. Khrennikov, “Towards Better Understanding QBism,” Found. Sci. 23, 181 (2018).
  36. H. Zhu, “Geometry of Quantum States,” unpublished notes, May 2017.
  37. M. Appleby, C. A. Fuchs and H. Zhu, “Group theoretic, Lie algebraic and Jordan algebraic formulations of the SIC existence problem,” Quantum Inf. Comput. 15, 61 (2015).
  38. K. Życzkowski and H.-J. Sommers, “Hilbert–Schmidt volume of the set of mixed quantum states,” J. Phys. A 34, 7111 (2003).
Citations (50)

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates that SIC-POVMs provide a minimal, complete framework to quantify the divergence between classical probability and quantum mechanics.
  • The methodology employs majorization theory to rigorously prove that SIC-POVMs closely align the quantum Born Rule with classical total probability.
  • The findings refine the conceptual role of the Born Rule, paving the way for advancements in quantum computation and resource theories.

An Examination of SIC-POVMs and Their Role in Distinguishing Quantum from Classical Theories

The paper presented in "Symmetric Informationally Complete Measurements Identify the Irreducible Difference between Classical and Quantum Systems" by DeBrota et al. provides a focused exploration into the fundamental distinction between classical and quantum mechanics through a unique application of Symmetric Informationally Complete Positive Operator-Valued Measures (SIC-POVMs). This work challenges the traditional perspectives by employing SIC-POVMs to reveal and quantify the divergence between classical probability theory and quantum mechanics.

Key Contributions and Findings

The authors develop a framework wherein SIC-POVMs offer a minimal informationally complete measure that holds significant implications for understanding quantum theory as an extension of classical probability calculus. The paper posits that the Born Rule in quantum mechanics serves as an empirically motivated constraint added to probability theory. Through this lens, SIC-POVMs emerge as optimal tools for minimizing discrepancies between quantum descriptions and classical expectations.

The paper demonstrates that employing SIC-POVMs results in a unique representation of the Born Rule that parallels the classical Law of Total Probability (LTP) more closely than other quantum frameworks. Specifically, the authors present that the representation given by SIC-POVMs achieves this resemblance by providing unitarily invariant norms that significantly reduce deviation from classicality. They offer rigorous proofs showing that SICs possess properties minimizing disparity in at least two senses, using majorization theory as an analytical backbone.

Implications for Quantum Information Theory

DeBrota et al.'s research offers remarkable insights into quantum information theory by advancing the understanding of how quantum properties can be incorporated within a classical probabilistic framework. The introduction of SIC-POVMs as a means to quantify negativity in quasiprobability representations holds potential applications in both theoretical explorations and practical quantum computation scenarios.

Future Directions

The aspiration to identify more generalized quantum relationships akin to SIC-POVMs remains a critical area for further exploration. The endeavor to prove SIC's existence in higher dimensions and their potential application in quantum computing offers intriguing possibilities. Additionally, the investigation into quasiprobability frameworks to understand resource theory's implications provides fertile ground for subsequent studies.

Overall, this paper's contributions mark significant progress in unraveling how quantum systems fundamentally differ from classical descriptions through probabilistic terms. The insights gleaned from this work pave the way for enriched understanding and exploration within quantum information science, holding implications for both conceptual and applied domains.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube