Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Generative Code Modeling with Graphs (1805.08490v2)

Published 22 May 2018 in cs.LG, cs.PL, and stat.ML

Abstract: Generative models for source code are an interesting structured prediction problem, requiring to reason about both hard syntactic and semantic constraints as well as about natural, likely programs. We present a novel model for this problem that uses a graph to represent the intermediate state of the generated output. The generative procedure interleaves grammar-driven expansion steps with graph augmentation and neural message passing steps. An experimental evaluation shows that our new model can generate semantically meaningful expressions, outperforming a range of strong baselines.

Generative Code Modeling with Graphs

The paper "Generative Code Modeling with Graphs" presents a novel approach to source code generation by leveraging graph-based representations as a means of addressing challenges associated with the structured nature of code. The authors introduce an innovative method that interweaves grammar-driven expansion steps with graph augmentation and neural message passing techniques, striving to enhance the semantic accuracy of generated programs.

Overview

The motivation behind this research is rooted in the intrinsic complexities of code synthesis. Generative models for source code need to manage both syntactic and semantic constraints alongside capturing the natural structure of programs. Prior approaches have often focused on either the natural language aspects or the formal semantic elements of code but rarely both concurrently. This paper addresses this gap by introducing a generative model that applies graph structures to represent the intermediate states of code during generation.

The proposed model transitions from traditional grammar-driven tree decoders to the graph setting, aiming to accommodate the multifaceted relations between code elements. The authors build on existing concepts of program graphs, enhancing them through graph neural networks (GNNs) to represent and process structured information within these graphs. Importantly, syntax trees are enriched with additional edges denoting established relationships, which are subsequently used in neural message passing phases.

Key Contributions

The paper makes several notable contributions, including:

  • Graph-Based Generative Procedure: It introduces a graph-based approach to generative modeling that integrates rich structural information available during code generation.
  • ExprGen Task: The authors define a novel code generation task named ExprGen, which focuses on generating semantically complex expressions within given code contexts.
  • Comprehensive Evaluation: The novel generative procedure is thoroughly evaluated against a spectrum of established baselines, proving its capability to generate semantically coherent expressions effectively.

Experimental Findings

The empirical evaluation detailed in the paper showcases the model's superior ability to generate semantically meaningful expressions, achieving higher performance metrics compared to strong baseline methods. The presented generative model exhibits lower per-token perplexity and improved accuracy in generating well-typed code expressions from context, enhancing over previous sequential, token-based generation techniques.

Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this research are significant for both practical applications and theoretical advancements in AI. Practically, the model could serve in code repair tasks, code completion environments, and intelligent code review systems by proposing context-aware, semantically valid code snippets. Theoretically, the work advances the understanding of integrating structured program representations into generative models, showing promising results with graph-based methods and neural message passing algorithms.

Looking forward, further development could involve expanding the generative capabilities to larger codebases and more diverse programming languages. Moreover, integrating additional contextual signals, such as historical data on code usage patterns or developer-specific stylistic preferences, could push the model's capabilities further. Additionally, the insights from this work could inform advancements in related areas such as semantic parsing, neural program synthesis, and generative strategies for natural language processing tasks.

In conclusion, this paper presents a significant step forward in generative code modeling, demonstrating the potential of graph-based approaches in capturing the intricacies of programming languages. The methods and findings discussed lay a foundation for future explorations into more sophisticated and semantically-aware code generation systems.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Marc Brockschmidt (30 papers)
  2. Miltiadis Allamanis (40 papers)
  3. Alexander L. Gaunt (24 papers)
  4. Oleksandr Polozov (17 papers)
Citations (173)