Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 85 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 94 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 221 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 464 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Reducing Noise for PIC Simulations Using Kernel Density Estimation Algorithm (1804.11174v2)

Published 30 Apr 2018 in physics.comp-ph and physics.plasm-ph

Abstract: Noise is a major concern for Particle-In-Cell (PIC) simulations. We propose a new theoretical and algorithmic framework to evaluate and reduce the noise level for PIC simulations based on the Kernel Density Estimation (KDE) theory, which has been widely adopted in machine learning and big data science. According to this framework, the error on particle density estimation for PIC simulations can be characterized by the Mean Integrated Square Error (MISE), which consists of two parts, systematic error and noise. A careful analysis shows that in the standard PIC methods noise is the dominate error, and the noise level can be reduced if we select different shape functions that are capable of balancing the systematic error and the noise. To improve performance, we use the von Mises distribution as the shape function and seek an optimal particle width that minimizes the MISE, represented by a Cross-Validation (CV) function. This procedure significantly reduces both the noise and the MISE for PIC simulations. A particle-wise width adjustment algorithm and a width update algorithm are further developed to reduce the MISE. Simulations using the examples of Langmuir wave and Landau Damping demonstrate that the KDE algorithm developed in the present study reduces the noise level on density estimation by 98%, and gives a much more accurate result on the linear damping rate compared to the standard PIC methods. Meanwhile, it is computational efficient that can save 40% time to achieve the same accuracy.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (2)