Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

NVIDIA Tensor Core Programmability, Performance & Precision (1803.04014v1)

Published 11 Mar 2018 in cs.DC and cs.PF
NVIDIA Tensor Core Programmability, Performance & Precision

Abstract: The NVIDIA Volta GPU microarchitecture introduces a specialized unit, called "Tensor Core" that performs one matrix-multiply-and-accumulate on 4x4 matrices per clock cycle. The NVIDIA Tesla V100 accelerator, featuring the Volta microarchitecture, provides 640 Tensor Cores with a theoretical peak performance of 125 Tflops/s in mixed precision. In this paper, we investigate current approaches to program NVIDIA Tensor Cores, their performances and the precision loss due to computation in mixed precision. Currently, NVIDIA provides three different ways of programming matrix-multiply-and-accumulate on Tensor Cores: the CUDA Warp Matrix Multiply Accumulate (WMMA) API, CUTLASS, a templated library based on WMMA, and cuBLAS GEMM. After experimenting with different approaches, we found that NVIDIA Tensor Cores can deliver up to 83 Tflops/s in mixed precision on a Tesla V100 GPU, seven and three times the performance in single and half precision respectively. A WMMA implementation of batched GEMM reaches a performance of 4 Tflops/s. While precision loss due to matrix multiplication with half precision input might be critical in many HPC applications, it can be considerably reduced at the cost of increased computation. Our results indicate that HPC applications using matrix multiplications can strongly benefit from using of NVIDIA Tensor Cores.

Overview of NVIDIA Tensor Core Programmability, Performance, and Precision

The paper "NVIDIA Tensor Core Programmability, Performance, Precision" provides a detailed examination of the NVIDIA Volta GPU microarchitecture, particularly focusing on the Tensor Core units and their applicability within high-performance computing (HPC). Introduced in the NVIDIA Tesla V100 accelerator, Tensor Cores are designed to enhance the computational efficiency of matrix-multiply-and-accumulate (MMA) operations using mixed precision. The paper evaluates several aspects critical to understanding Tensor Cores: programming models, performance metrics, and precision trade-offs.

Programming NVIDIA Tensor Cores

The implementation of Tensor Cores involves three primary programming interfaces:

  1. CUDA Warp Matrix Multiply Accumulate (WMMA): This API provides a direct though rudimentary level of control over Tensor Core operations. Its capability is currently limited to fixed-size matrix operations, and it requires handling via CUDA warps to maximize performance.
  2. CUTLASS: As a templated library, CUTLASS builds on WMMA to offer more flexible matrix multiplication strategies with varying tiling and pipelining options to optimize performance.
  3. cuBLAS: The cuBLAS library allows higher-level programming with potential mathematical optimizations abstracted away from the user. Specific settings enable the use of Tensor Cores for generalized matrix to matrix multiplication (GEMM) operations.

The exploration of these programming interfaces indicates a mature ecosystem although further developments could enhance the expressiveness and efficiency in deploying Tensor Cores in varied computational settings.

Performance Analysis

Theoretical peak performance of the Tensor Cores in the Tesla V100 GPU is stated at 125 Tflops/s in mixed precision. The results presented indicate that Tensor Cores can reach approximately 83 Tflops/s under optimal conditions, representing a sixfold increase over single precision MMAs on CUDA cores. Notably, the efficiency of Tensor Cores in executing batched GEMM operations enables significant speed-ups for workloads involving numerous small matrix multiplications—common in applications such as the Fast Multipole Method.

Despite the impressive performance gains, the observed peak does not fully align with theoretical values, underscoring potential areas for optimization, particularly in memory traffic management and kernel execution alongside traditional CUDA cores.

Precision Considerations and Trade-Offs

Tensor Cores operate in a mixed-precision regime where inputs are processed in half precision, and accumulation occurs in single precision. While this approach accelerates throughput by minimizing memory bandwidth usage, the resultant rounding errors can be substantial, especially as the matrix sizes grow. To mitigate precision loss, the paper proposes a refinement technique employing a form of error correction through additional computational passes.

The analysis demonstrates that employing these techniques can reduce error by an order of magnitude, though this benefit comes at the cost of increased computational workload and associated execution time. The balance between precision and performance remains crucial for adopting Tensor Core acceleration in HPC use cases.

Implications and Future Directions

The research elucidates both the advantages and constraints of incorporating NVIDIA Tensor Cores within high-performance computing infrastructure. TNVIDIA's continued development of CUDA APIs and associated libraries will be instrumental in maximizing Tensor Core utility across diversified applications, whether in deep learning or traditional HPC.

For HPC applications, performance gains must be meticulously weighed against acceptable levels of precision loss—particularly when scientific accuracy cannot be compromised. Future studies should focus on optimizing memory usage and computational kernel designs, investigating hybrid techniques that leverage both Tensor Core and CUDA Core operations. Expanding the repertoire of single and mixed-precision refinement methods will also fortify the Tensor Core’s role in computational science and engineering tasks.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Stefano Markidis (106 papers)
  2. Steven Wei Der Chien (1 paper)
  3. Erwin Laure (32 papers)
  4. Ivy Bo Peng (12 papers)
  5. Jeffrey S. Vetter (12 papers)
Citations (335)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com