Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 94 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 120 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 162 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 470 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Semi-Smooth Newton Algorithm for High-Dimensional Nonconvex Sparse Learning (1802.08895v4)

Published 24 Feb 2018 in stat.CO and stat.ME

Abstract: The smoothly clipped absolute deviation (SCAD) and the minimax concave penalty (MCP) penalized regression models are two important and widely used nonconvex sparse learning tools that can handle variable selection and parameter estimation simultaneously, and thus have potential applications in various fields such as mining biological data in high-throughput biomedical studies. Theoretically, these two models enjoy the oracle property even in the high-dimensional settings, where the number of predictors $p$ may be much larger than the number of observations $n$. However, numerically, it is quite challenging to develop fast and stable algorithms due to their non-convexity and non-smoothness. In this paper we develop a fast algorithm for SCAD and MCP penalized learning problems. First, we show that the global minimizers of both models are roots of the nonsmooth equations. Then, a semi-smooth Newton (SSN) algorithm is employed to solve the equations. We prove that the SSN algorithm converges locally and superlinearly to the Karush-Kuhn-Tucker (KKT) points. Computational complexity analysis shows that the cost of the SSN algorithm per iteration is $O(np)$. Combined with the warm-start technique, the SSN algorithm can be very efficient and accurate. Simulation studies and a real data example suggest that our SSN algorithm, with comparable solution accuracy with the coordinate descent (CD) and the difference of convex (DC) proximal Newton algorithms, is more computationally efficient.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.