Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Query expansion techniques for information retrieval: A survey (1708.00247v2)

Published 1 Aug 2017 in cs.IR

Abstract: With the ever increasing size of the web, relevant information extraction on the Internet with a query formed by a few keywords has become a big challenge. Query Expansion (QE) plays a crucial role in improving searches on the Internet. Here, the user's initial query is reformulated by adding additional meaningful terms with similar significance. QE -- as part of information retrieval (IR) -- has long attracted researchers' attention. It has become very influential in the field of personalized social document, question answering, cross-language IR, information filtering and multimedia IR. Research in QE has gained further prominence because of IR dedicated conferences such as TREC (Text Information Retrieval Conference) and CLEF (Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum). This paper surveys QE techniques in IR from 1960 to 2017 with respect to core techniques, data sources used, weighting and ranking methodologies, user participation and applications -- bringing out similarities and differences.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Hiteshwar Kumar Azad (3 papers)
  2. Akshay Deepak (11 papers)
Citations (259)

Summary

Essay on "Query Expansion Techniques for Information Retrieval: a Survey"

The paper "Query Expansion Techniques for Information Retrieval: a Survey," authored by Hiteshwar Kumar Azad and Akshay Deepak, provides a comprehensive review of query expansion (QE) methods in information retrieval (IR) covering developments from 1960 through 2017. In response to the exponential growth of the web, the paper explores QE's significance in enhancing search efficacy despite the naturally short length of user queries, typically averaging 2.4 words. This survey meticulously classifies QE approaches, analyses their methodologies, and elucidates their applications across varying domains. The endeavor builds upon prior work in QE, presenting a detailed overview and analysis that broadens understanding within the domain.

Key Features of the Paper

The survey categorizes data sources used in QE into four primary classes: documents used in retrieval processes, hand-built knowledge resources, external text collections and resources, and hybrid sources. This categorization underscores the diversity and evolution of sources over time, from traditional text corpora to web-based and user-generated content. The core techniques involve relevance feedback, pseudo-relevance feedback, and various approaches leveraging different data sources. The paper further delineates these approaches into global and local analyses, spanning linguistic, corpus-based, search log-based, and web-based methodologies. This structured mapping of QE techniques not only consolidates past advancements but also provides a lens to evaluate and extend current methodologies.

Numerical Insights and Claims

Though not reliant on bold numerical claims, the paper does stress the quantifiable improvements in retrieval effectiveness due to QE. For instance, advancements in pseudo-relevance feedback and hybrid data sources have demonstrated a remarkable increase in both precision and recall rates. Through its comprehensive analysis, the paper positions QE as a pivotal method, capable of enhancing search relevance by up to 25% or more compared to non-expanded queries, as evidenced by experimental results cited.

Implications for the Future of IR and QE

The survey's implications are significant both in theoretical understanding and practical applications of QE. It suggests a continued focus on hybrid techniques, combining benefits from diverse data sources to handle the complexities of vocabulary mismatch more robustly. The paper advocates for personalized QE approaches, reflecting user-specific contexts and preferences, which aligns with the growing necessity for personalization in IR systems due to diverse user expectations and behavior.

Given the advancements in artificial intelligence and linguistic processing since the paper's publication, QE techniques are poised for further evolution. The integration of deep learning models and semantic analysis can offer richer contextual understanding, potentially revolutionizing QE strategies and their effectiveness in tackling the vocabulary and semantic mismatch in IR systems.

Conclusion

The paper “Query Expansion Techniques for Information Retrieval: a Survey” serves as both an academic cornerstone and a practical guide for IR researchers and practitioners. By detailing the multifaceted approaches to QE and their impact on retrieval performance across contexts, it provides a robust framework for future innovation in the field. It sets the stage for exploring novel QE methods that leverage advancements in AI and data-driven personalization, ensuring continued progress in the field of information retrieval.