Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 89 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 38 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 20 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 202 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 469 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The clustering of H$β$+[OIII] and [OII] emitters since $z \sim 5$: dependencies with line luminosity and stellar mass (1705.01101v1)

Published 2 May 2017 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: We investigate the clustering properties of $\sim 7000$ H$\beta$+[OIII] and [OII] narrowband-selected emitters at $z \sim 0.8 - 4.7$ from the High-$z$ Emission Line Survey. We find clustering lengths, $r_0$, of $1.5 - 4.0h{-1}$ Mpc and minimum dark matter halo masses of $10{10.7 - 12.1}\rm{M}\odot$ for our $z = 0.8 - 3.2$ H$\beta$+[OIII] emitters and $r_0 \sim 2.0 - 8.3h{-1}$ Mpc and halo masses of $10{11.5 - 12.6}\rm{M}\odot$ for our $z = 1.5 - 4.7$ [OII] emitters. We find $r_0$ to strongly increase both with increasing line luminosity and redshift. By taking into account the evolution of the characteristic line luminosity, $L\star(z)$, and using our model predictions of halo mass given $r_0$, we find a strong, redshift-independent increasing trend between $L/L\star(z)$ and minimum halo mass. The faintest H$\beta$+[OIII] emitters are found to reside in $10{9.5}\rm{M}_\odot$ halos and the brightest emitters in $10{13.0}\rm{M}_\odot$ halos. For [OII] emitters, the faintest emitters are found in $10{10.5} \rm{M}\odot$ halos and the brightest emitters in $10{12.6}\rm{M}\odot$ halos. A redshift-independent stellar mass dependency is also observed where the halo mass increases from $10{11}\rm{M}_\odot$ to $10{12.5} \rm{M}\odot$ for stellar masses of $10{8.5}\rm{M}\odot$ to $10{11.5}\rm{M}_\odot$, respectively. We investigate the interdependencies of these trends by repeating our analysis in a $L_\textrm{line} - \rm{M}\textrm{star}$ grid space for our most populated samples (H$\beta$+[OIII] $z = 0.84$ and [OII] $z = 1.47$) and find that the line luminosity dependency is stronger than the stellar mass dependency on halo mass. For $L > L\star$ emitters at all epochs, we find a relatively flat trend with halo masses of $10{12.5 - 13}\rm{M}\odot$ which may be due to quenching mechanisms in massive halos which is consistent with a transitional halo mass predicted by models.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.