- The paper presents a self-attentive mechanism that forms a 2-D matrix of sentence embeddings, capturing diverse semantic components.
- It integrates a bidirectional LSTM with self-attention, outperforming baselines in author profiling, sentiment analysis, and textual entailment.
- A penalization term enforces diversity among weight vectors, enhancing interpretability by highlighting key sentence parts.
A Structured Self-attentive Sentence Embedding
Introduction
The paper "A Structured Self-attentive Sentence Embedding" by Zhouhan Lin, Minwei Feng, Cicero Nogueira dos Santos, Mo Yu, Bing Xiang, Bowen Zhou, and Yoshua Bengio presents a novel model for generating interpretable sentence embeddings using a self-attention mechanism. The primary contribution of the work is the representation of sentence embeddings as a 2-D matrix, where each row of the matrix attends to different parts of the sentence. This model is evaluated on three distinct tasks: author profiling, sentiment classification, and textual entailment, demonstrating significant performance improvements over previous sentence embedding methods.
Proposed Model
The core of the proposed model is a self-attentive mechanism built on top of a bidirectional LSTM (BiLSTM). The model comprises two main components:
- Bidirectional LSTM: This component processes the input sentence to capture dependencies between adjacent words from both directions.
- Self-attention Mechanism: After the BiLSTM provides hidden states for each word, the self-attention mechanism generates a set of summation weight vectors. These vectors are used to compute weighted sums of the BiLSTM hidden states, resulting in multiple vector representations that collectively form a matrix embedding for the sentence.
The attention mechanism ensures that each vector representation within the matrix can focus on different aspects of the sentence. The resulting matrix embedding provides a rich and diverse representation by capturing various semantic components.
Regularization
To address potential redundancy in the generated embeddings, the authors introduce a penalization term that encourages diversity across the summation weight vectors. This term relies on the Frobenius norm of the difference between the dot product of the annotation matrix and an identity matrix, thus pushing the summation weights to be distinct from one another.
Visualization
A notable feature of this approach is the ease of interpreting the extracted embeddings. By visualizing the annotation matrix, one can observe which specific sentence parts are captured by each row of the matrix embedding. This enhances the transparency and interpretability of the model's decisions.
Experimental Evaluation
The model was evaluated on three tasks using three datasets:
- Author Profiling (Age Dataset): This task involved predicting the age range of a Twitter user based on their English tweets. The proposed model achieved an accuracy of 80.45%, outperforming baselines like BiLSTM with max pooling (77.40%) and CNN with max pooling (78.15%).
- Sentiment Analysis (Yelp Dataset): For this five-class sentiment classification task, the model showed an accuracy of 64.21%, exceeding the performance of BiLSTM (61.99%) and CNN (62.05%).
- Textual Entailment (SNLI Dataset): This involved determining the logical relationship between pairs of sentences. The model achieved 84.4% accuracy, close to the state-of-the-art result of 84.6% achieved by the NSE encoders, and outperforming multiple other strong baselines.
Exploratory Experiments
The paper also discussed several exploratory experiments to investigate different components of the model:
- Effect of Penalization Term: Introducing the penalization term encouraged diversity among the weight vectors, improving the model's performance on the Age and Yelp datasets.
- Effect of Multiple Vectors: Varying the number of rows in the matrix embedding (parameter
r
) consistently showed that having multiple rows significantly improves performance compared to a single vector representation.
Implications and Future Directions
The structured self-attentive sentence embedding model provides a versatile and interpretable method for sentence representation. Practical implications include better performance on various NLP tasks and the added benefit of interpretable embeddings. The theoretical implications suggest advancements in attention mechanisms and their integration with LSTM architectures.
Future work could explore extensions to unsupervised learning settings, improving the model's capability to handle longer sequences like paragraphs or documents, and experimenting with more complex attention mechanisms beyond weighted summations.
Conclusion
The paper successfully introduces a novel self-attentive mechanism for sentence embedding that significantly improves performance on multiple NLP tasks while providing interpretable representations. This work exemplifies the potential of attention mechanisms in enhancing both the performance and interpretability of sentence representations.