Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 94 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 44 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 120 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 162 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 470 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The quenched mass portion of star-forming galaxies and the origin of the star formation sequence slope (1611.04698v1)

Published 15 Nov 2016 in astro-ph.GA

Abstract: Observationally, a massive disk galaxy can harbor a bulge component that is comparably inactive as a quiescent galaxy (QG). It has been speculated that the quenched component contained in star-forming galaxies (SFGs) is the reason why the star formation main sequence (MS) has a shallow slope at high masses. In this paper, we present a toy model to quantify the quenched mass portion of SFGs ($f_{\rm Q}$) at fixed stellar mass ($M_{\ast}$) and to reconcile the MS slopes both in the low and the high mass regimes. In this model, each SFG is composed by a star-forming plus a quenched component. The mass of the star-forming component ($M_{\rm SF}$) correlates with the star formation rate (SFR) following a relation SFR $\propto M_{\rm SF}{\alpha_{\rm SF}}$, where $\alpha_{\rm SF}\sim 1.0$ . The quenched component contributes to the stellar mass but does not to the SFR. It is thus possible to quantify $f_{\rm Q}$ based on the departure of the observed MS slope $\alpha$ from $\alpha_{\rm SF}$. Adopting the redshift-dependent MS slope reported by \citet{Whitaker 2014}, we explore the evolution of the $f_{\rm Q}-M_{\ast}$ relations over $z=[0.5,2.5]$. We find that Milky-Way mass SFGs (with $M_{\ast}\approx 10{10.7}M_{\odot}$) typically have a $f_{\rm Q}=30\%-40\%$ at $z\sim 2.25$, whereas this value rapidly rises up to $70\%-80\%$ at $z\sim 0.75$. The origin of an $\alpha\sim 1.0$ MS slope seen in the low mass regime is also discussed. We argue for a scenario in which the majority of low mass SFGs stay in a "steady-stage" star formation phase. In this phase, the SFR is mainly regulated by stellar feedback and not significantly influenced by the quenching mechanisms, thus keeping roughly constant over cosmic time. This scenario successfully produces an $\alpha \sim 1.0$ MS slope, as well as the observed MS evolution from $z=2.5$ to $z=0$ at low masses.

Citations (10)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.