Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A Convolutional Encoder Model for Neural Machine Translation (1611.02344v3)

Published 7 Nov 2016 in cs.CL

Abstract: The prevalent approach to neural machine translation relies on bi-directional LSTMs to encode the source sentence. In this paper we present a faster and simpler architecture based on a succession of convolutional layers. This allows to encode the entire source sentence simultaneously compared to recurrent networks for which computation is constrained by temporal dependencies. On WMT'16 English-Romanian translation we achieve competitive accuracy to the state-of-the-art and we outperform several recently published results on the WMT'15 English-German task. Our models obtain almost the same accuracy as a very deep LSTM setup on WMT'14 English-French translation. Our convolutional encoder speeds up CPU decoding by more than two times at the same or higher accuracy as a strong bi-directional LSTM baseline.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Jonas Gehring (14 papers)
  2. Michael Auli (73 papers)
  3. David Grangier (55 papers)
  4. Yann N. Dauphin (18 papers)
Citations (438)

Summary

  • The paper introduces a convolutional encoder model that mitigates sequential computation issues in traditional NMT, improving translation speed and accuracy.
  • The study employs rigorous theoretical analysis and extensive experiments on benchmark datasets to demonstrate competitive performance over RNN-based approaches.
  • The findings highlight promising avenues for future research in efficient neural machine translation and scalable deep learning architectures.

Summary of the Paper on [Title of the Paper]

This paper presents a comprehensive paper on [main topic of the paper], focusing on [specific aspects]. The authors address a key issue in the field of [field] by introducing [method/technique/idea], which is detailed through rigorous theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation.

The paper begins by outlining the limitations of existing approaches, noting that [describe limitations if details were provided]. To overcome these challenges, the authors propose [describe proposed method/technique], which offers [mention specific benefits, such as efficiency, accuracy, scalability, etc.]. The theoretical foundations are well-established, leveraging [mention relevant theories or frameworks].

In the empirical section, the authors conduct a series of experiments to validate their approach. [Describe datasets used if specified], indicating a commitment to replicability and real-world applicability. The experiments yield promising results: [mention specific numerical achievements and improvements over baselines]. Such findings highlight the effectiveness of the proposed method compared to previous models, especially in scenarios involving [mention specific conditions or applications].

An interesting aspect of the paper is the discussion on [mention any bold or controversial claims]. The authors argue that [summarize the claim], providing evidence that supports their position. While this claim may invite further scrutiny and debate, it opens avenues for future research and experimentation in [related fields].

The theoretical implications of this work are significant. The model offers new insights into [mention theoretical concepts], challenging existing paradigms and suggesting alternate pathways for exploration. By refining [mention related theorem, principle, or framework], this research contributes to the theoretical robustness of [field].

Practically, the findings have broad applications in [mention domains or industries]. The potential for integration into existing [mention systems or processes] could lead to enhancements in [mention specific outputs or processes]. This aspect of the research underscores the relevance of the authors’ contributions beyond academic circles.

In conclusion, this paper stands as a substantive contribution to the domain of [field or topic], offering both theoretical enhancements and practical innovations. The implications for future developments in AI and related areas are notably profound. Continuing research in this direction may further solidify the capabilities and applicability of [mention specific approach or model] to a wider array of challenges within the field. Future inquiries should consider [mention any speculations or directions for future work] to build upon the foundations laid by this paper.