Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
102 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Connecting Generative Adversarial Networks and Actor-Critic Methods (1610.01945v3)

Published 6 Oct 2016 in cs.LG and stat.ML

Abstract: Both generative adversarial networks (GAN) in unsupervised learning and actor-critic methods in reinforcement learning (RL) have gained a reputation for being difficult to optimize. Practitioners in both fields have amassed a large number of strategies to mitigate these instabilities and improve training. Here we show that GANs can be viewed as actor-critic methods in an environment where the actor cannot affect the reward. We review the strategies for stabilizing training for each class of models, both those that generalize between the two and those that are particular to that model. We also review a number of extensions to GANs and RL algorithms with even more complicated information flow. We hope that by highlighting this formal connection we will encourage both GAN and RL communities to develop general, scalable, and stable algorithms for multilevel optimization with deep networks, and to draw inspiration across communities.

Connecting Generative Adversarial Networks and Actor-Critic Methods

This paper proposes a formal linkage between two prominent multilevel optimization paradigms in machine learning: Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) and Actor-Critic (AC) methods. The authors illuminate the underlying connections, articulating that GANs can be conceptualized as actor-critic models in a specific environment setting, where the actor does not directly influence the reward received. This theoretical framework facilitates a cross-pollination of stabilization techniques between the GAN and reinforcement learning (RL) communities, potentially fostering the development of more robust, scalable algorithms for deep network optimization.

GANs and AC methods are both predicated on a multilevel optimization framework, wherein one model is optimized contingent on the optimality of another model. The paper describes GANs utilizing a framework in which a generator and a discriminator engage in a zero-sum game with the cross-entropy as a loss function, while actor-critic approaches optimize a policy function alongside an action-value function to maximize expected rewards within an MDP.

A pivotal proposition of this paper is the view of GANs as a variant of actor-critic methods. The discriminator in GANs functions analytically as the critic, providing gradients to a generator modeled as the actor. This proposal offers significant insights into the adversarial nature of GANs, notably when the actor lacks a causal impact on the environment's reward signals. Here, the actor is obliged to depend solely on the error signals from the discriminator. This indistinguishability in roles gives rise to adversarial training dynamics, akin to those occasionally seen in certain pathological RL scenarios.

In terms of algorithmic stabilizations, the authors present an exhaustive examination of stabilization strategies pertinent to both GANs and AC frameworks. They introduce techniques such as freezing learning, label smoothing, historical averaging, minibatch discrimination, and batch normalization as methods which have proven effective for GAN stabilization. Simultaneously, AC methods benefit from replay buffers, target networks, entropy regularization, and compatibility conditions that ameliorate training instabilities. The authors advocate the exploration of these strategies’ applicability across both GANs and AC methods, potentially yielding lucrative improvements in stability and performance.

This conceptual linking of GANs with AC paradigms bears significant implications for both practical applications and theoretical developments in machine learning. By modeling GANs within the sphere of RL frameworks, a broad range of optimization techniques, traditionally reserved for reinforcement learning, are opened up for application in unsupervised generative modeling, and vice versa. Moreover, the insights may catalyze advancements in understanding and designing complex multilevel optimization scenarios within deep learning.

As a forward-looking discussion, this research provokes the curiosity of the scholarly community towards extending this multilevel optimization framework to other deep learning scenarios involving complex interactions between multiple models. The paper thus emphasizes advancing beyond traditional single-objective optimization, aligning more closely with intricate real-world computation challenges. This cross-disciplinary discourse signifies a deeper exploration into hybrid models adopting strategies from both GANs and AC methodologies to architect solutions for more sophisticated, high-dimensional learning tasks.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. David Pfau (18 papers)
  2. Oriol Vinyals (116 papers)
Citations (185)
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com