Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 178 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 385 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Three new classes of optimal frequency-hopping sequence sets (1605.03454v1)

Published 11 May 2016 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: The study of frequency-hopping sequences (FHSs) has been focused on the establishment of theoretical bounds for the parameters of FHSs as well as on the construction of optimal FHSs with respect to the bounds. Peng and Fan (2004) derived two lower bounds on the maximum nontrivial Hamming correlation of an FHS set, which is an important indicator in measuring the performance of an FHS set employed in practice. In this paper, we obtain two main results. We study the construction of new optimal frequency-hopping sequence sets by using cyclic codes over finite fields. Let $\mathcal{C}$ be a cyclic code of length $n$ over a finite field $\mathbb{F}_q$ such that $\mathcal{C}$ contains the one-dimensional subcode $ \mathcal{C}_0={(\alpha,\alpha,\cdots,\alpha)\in \mathbb{F}_qn\,|\,\alpha\in \mathbb{F}_q}. $ Two codewords of $\mathcal{C}$ are said to be equivalent if one can be obtained from the other through applying the cyclic shift a certain number of times. We present a necessary and sufficient condition under which the equivalence class of any codeword in $\mathcal{C}\setminus\mathcal{C}_0$ has size $n$. This result addresses an open question raised by Ding {\it et al.} in \cite{Ding09}. As a consequence, three new classes of optimal FHS sets with respect to the Singleton bound are obtained, some of which are also optimal with respect to the Peng-Fan bound at the same time. We also show that the two Peng-Fan bounds are, in fact, identical.

Citations (13)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube