Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Learning to Hash for Indexing Big Data - A Survey (1509.05472v1)

Published 17 Sep 2015 in cs.LG

Abstract: The explosive growth in big data has attracted much attention in designing efficient indexing and search methods recently. In many critical applications such as large-scale search and pattern matching, finding the nearest neighbors to a query is a fundamental research problem. However, the straightforward solution using exhaustive comparison is infeasible due to the prohibitive computational complexity and memory requirement. In response, Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) search based on hashing techniques has become popular due to its promising performance in both efficiency and accuracy. Prior randomized hashing methods, e.g., Locality-Sensitive Hashing (LSH), explore data-independent hash functions with random projections or permutations. Although having elegant theoretic guarantees on the search quality in certain metric spaces, performance of randomized hashing has been shown insufficient in many real-world applications. As a remedy, new approaches incorporating data-driven learning methods in development of advanced hash functions have emerged. Such learning to hash methods exploit information such as data distributions or class labels when optimizing the hash codes or functions. Importantly, the learned hash codes are able to preserve the proximity of neighboring data in the original feature spaces in the hash code spaces. The goal of this paper is to provide readers with systematic understanding of insights, pros and cons of the emerging techniques. We provide a comprehensive survey of the learning to hash framework and representative techniques of various types, including unsupervised, semi-supervised, and supervised. In addition, we also summarize recent hashing approaches utilizing the deep learning models. Finally, we discuss the future direction and trends of research in this area.

Citations (501)

Summary

  • The paper presents a comprehensive survey of hashing methods improving approximate nearest neighbor search efficiency in big data.
  • It contrasts data-independent techniques like LSH with data-dependent, supervised, and deep learning-based approaches.
  • It demonstrates significant storage and query time reductions, underscoring the practical impact on large-scale indexing.

Essay on "Learning to Hash for Indexing Big Data - A Survey"

The paper "Learning to Hash for Indexing Big Data - A Survey" by Wang, Liu, Kumar, and Chang provides a thorough examination of hashing techniques used for approximate nearest neighbor (ANN) search in massive datasets. The challenges posed by the need for efficient search methods amidst the rapid expansion of big data motivate the exploration and development of hashing-based approaches.

Overview

Hashing-based methodologies, particularly for ANN search, have gained prominence due to their ability to offer sublinear or constant query times while maintaining a level of accuracy that is often sufficient for practical applications. The survey explores both traditional randomized hashing techniques, like Locality-Sensitive Hashing (LSH), and contemporary learning-based hashing methods that leverage data-specific information.

Key Concepts and Methodologies

The primary focus is on data-dependent methods, as these provide improved performance over their data-independent counterparts, such as LSH. The authors categorize the learning-based approaches into unsupervised, supervised, and semi-supervised frameworks. Significant attention is devoted to supervised hashing, which uses labeled data to enhance the quality of the hash functions, thus ensuring better alignment with the semantic similarities inherent in data.

Unsupervised and Semi-Supervised Approaches

Unsupervised techniques, like spectral hashing, use data distributions and manifold structures for hash function design, aiming to preserve the neighborhood relationships of the data points. Semi-supervised methods further refine this by integrating labeled and unlabeled data, optimizing the balance between the empirical loss on the labeled set and maximizing information gain from the unlabeled dataset.

Supervised Hashing

Supervised techniques exploit pointwise, pairwise, and more complex listwise relationships among data to learn hash functions. These methods have demonstrated significant efficacy in aligning the resulting hash codes with semantic similarities, which is crucial in applications such as image retrieval.

Performance and Numerical Results

The paper presents strong numerical results in scenarios where optimized hash functions significantly reduce storage requirements and query times. For example, datasets that would typically necessitate hundreds of gigabytes of storage can be represented in much more compact forms—often a reduction by orders of magnitude without substantial loss in retrieval accuracy.

Advanced Techniques

The exploration of advanced methods, including deep learning models for hashing, marks an important development toward further enhancing the representational power of hash codes. Deep learning frameworks can potentially unify feature learning and hash function optimization, presenting opportunities for breakthroughs in efficiency and accuracy.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

While the paper refrains from sensational claims about the future impact of these technologies, it underscores the need for continued research to address open challenges—such as deriving theoretical guarantees comparable to those of LSH within the learning-based paradigm. Moreover, the integration of heterogeneous data types and multimodal datasets into the learning process signifies a compelling frontier in hashing research.

Future Directions

Future advancements could involve the pursuit of unified architectures that couple representation and binary code learning, particularly through deep neural networks, to mitigate the semantic gap. Additionally, the development of hashing techniques catering to heterogeneous data elements aims to enhance efficacy and application scope.

In summary, the survey meticulously outlines the evolving landscape of hashing for big data, offering a foundational understanding for researchers and highlighting avenues for potential contributions to the field. The implications for AI and data science are significant, as these enhanced indexing methods could dramatically influence areas ranging from data mining to real-time search applications.