Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 89 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 29 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 98 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 424 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 164 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Modification of Bayesian Updating where Continuous Parameters have Differing Relationships with New and Existing Data (1308.2791v1)

Published 13 Aug 2013 in stat.ME, math.ST, and stat.TH

Abstract: Bayesian analyses are often performed using so-called noninformative priors, with a view to achieving objective inference about unknown parameters on which available data depends. Noninformative priors depend on the relationship of the data to the parameters over the sample space. Combining Bayesian updating - multiplying an existing posterior density for parameters being estimated by a likelihood function derived from independent new data that depend on those parameters and renormalizing - with use of noninformative priors gives rise to inconsistency where existing and new data depend on continuous parameters in different ways. In such cases, noninformative priors for inference from only the existing and from only the new data would differ, so Bayesian updating would give different final posterior densities depending on which set of data was used to derive an initial posterior and which was used to update that posterior. I propose a revised Bayesian updating method, which resolves this inconsistency by updating the prior as well as the likelihood function, and involves only a single application of Bayes' theorem. The revised method is also applicable where actual prior information as to parameter values exists and inference that objectively reflects the existing information as well as new data is sought. I demonstrate by numerical testing the probability-matching superiority of the proposed revised updating method, in two cases.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)