Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Data Mining: A Prediction for Performance Improvement of Engineering Students using Classification (1203.3832v1)

Published 17 Mar 2012 in cs.LG

Abstract: Now-a-days the amount of data stored in educational database increasing rapidly. These databases contain hidden information for improvement of students' performance. Educational data mining is used to study the data available in the educational field and bring out the hidden knowledge from it. Classification methods like decision trees, Bayesian network etc can be applied on the educational data for predicting the student's performance in examination. This prediction will help to identify the weak students and help them to score better marks. The C4.5, ID3 and CART decision tree algorithms are applied on engineering student's data to predict their performance in the final exam. The outcome of the decision tree predicted the number of students who are likely to pass, fail or promoted to next year. The results provide steps to improve the performance of the students who were predicted to fail or promoted. After the declaration of the results in the final examination the marks obtained by the students are fed into the system and the results were analyzed for the next session. The comparative analysis of the results states that the prediction has helped the weaker students to improve and brought out betterment in the result.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (2)
  1. Surjeet Kumar Yadav (4 papers)
  2. Saurabh Pal (12 papers)
Citations (251)

Summary

Predictive Analysis for Academic Performance Enhancement in Engineering Students Through Classification Methods

The research article in focus discusses the application of data mining techniques, specifically decision tree classification algorithms, to predict and potentially enhance the academic performance of engineering students. In the context of this paper, educational data mining is leveraged to extract actionable insights from data accumulated in educational environments, aiming to identify students at risk of underperformance in final examinations. The paper evaluates the efficacy of the C4.5, ID3, and CART decision tree algorithms in producing a predictive model that assists in identifying students likely to fail, pass, or be promoted.

Methodology and Algorithms

The decision tree is employed as a primary method due to its interpretability and effective classification capabilities. The core algorithms assessed include:

  1. ID3 Algorithm: Originating from Quinlan's work, this algorithm constructs decision trees using information gain as a heuristic for identifying the attribute that most effectively classifies the training data. A notable drawback is its limitation to categorical data and lack of a pruning mechanism, which may lead to performance degradation in noisy datasets.
  2. C4.5 Algorithm: This is an advancement over ID3, accommodating both continuous and categorical attributes, and incorporates mechanisms for handling missing values and pruning via pessimistic error estimation. It utilizes the gain ratio, mitigating the biases observed with information gain.
  3. CART Algorithm: Emphasizing binary tree construction, CART uses the Gini index to determine attribute splits. It is distinguished by its capability to handle both classification and regression tasks and its use of cost complexity pruning.

Experimental Setup

The paper used data from engineering students at VBS Purvanchal University from sessions corresponding to 2010. The data preparation phase involved transforming enroLLMent forms into an ARFF file for processing in the WEKA software, facilitating tenfold cross-validation for model accuracy. The paper used several data attributes, including socio-demographic variables, educational background, and family support structures.

Results and Discussion

Among the key outcomes, C4.5 demonstrated the highest classification accuracy at 67.78%, while ID3 and CART followed closely with accuracies of 62.22% each. The performance metrics, such as the True Positive (TP) rate for the 'Fail' class, indicated that both ID3 and C4.5 can effectively identify at-risk students, denoted by a TP rate of 0.786. These results emphasize the potential of decision trees in predictive analysis for educational outcomes. However, idiosyncrasies in data handling (e.g., categorical vs. continuous data) affect each algorithm's efficiency, informing their optimal use cases.

Implications and Future Work

The research posits significant implications for educational organizations considering data-driven methods to preemptively support students who might struggle academically. Early detection of students at risk allows for targeted interventions, such as tutoring or counseling, thereby improving overall academic outcomes and retention rates. The paper opens avenues for future work in integrating more sophisticated machine learning models that can perhaps engage with unstructured data such as textual and sociocultural influences on learning behavior, potentially incorporating neural networks or ensemble methods to improve prediction robustness and interpretability.

In essence, this exploration into educational data mining underscores the utility of data-driven methodologies in academic settings, providing a scaffolding upon which further, nuanced student support systems can be constructed. The challenge lies in expanding these models to encompass broader, more diverse educational datasets to generalize predictions across cultures and curricula. The continual improvement of these methods holds promise for significant advancements in educational analytics and the elevation of academic success universally.