Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Can We Learn to Beat the Best Stock (1107.0036v1)

Published 30 Jun 2011 in cs.AI and q-fin.TR

Abstract: A novel algorithm for actively trading stocks is presented. While traditional expert advice and "universal" algorithms (as well as standard technical trading heuristics) attempt to predict winners or trends, our approach relies on predictable statistical relations between all pairs of stocks in the market. Our empirical results on historical markets provide strong evidence that this type of technical trading can "beat the market" and moreover, can beat the best stock in the market. In doing so we utilize a new idea for smoothing critical parameters in the context of expert learning.

Citations (241)

Summary

  • The paper introduces the ANTICOR algorithm, a novel portfolio selection method that leverages predictable statistical relationships among stock pairs rather than directly predicting prices.
  • Empirical results show the ANTICOR algorithm often achieves commendable returns, frequently transcending the best-performing stock within historical datasets tested.
  • While demonstrating superior performance under controlled conditions, the authors caution that practical efficacy may be reduced by factors like transaction costs and rebalancing frequency.

Analyzing "Can We Learn to Beat the Best Stock"

The paper "Can We Learn to Beat the Best Stock" by Borodin, El-Yaniv, and Gogan, presents a novel approach to portfolio selection in the domain of computational finance. The authors introduce a sophisticated algorithm designed to outperform not only the market as a whole but also the best-performing stock, a feat traditionally plagued by skepticism.

Portfolio Selection Problem and Traditional Approaches

The portfolio selection problem is a fundamental challenge in finance and machine learning. Classical approaches often employ universal algorithms and expert advice systems, which aim to predict market trends and select potential winning stocks. Nonetheless, such methods have shown limited practical utility in consistently delivering returns superior to naive strategies like uniform buy-and-hold (U-BAH). The paper stresses the distinction between sequence prediction, which has performed well, and portfolio selection strategies, which often underperform compared to simplistic investment strategies.

ANTICOR Algorithm

The crux of the authors' contribution lies in the ANTICOR (anti-correlation) algorithm, which leverages predictable statistical relationships among stock pairs, focusing on market volatility and persistent statistical patterns rather than direct prediction of stock prices. ANTICOR breaks away from traditional prediction models by adopting a constant rebalancing strategy, capitalizing on market fluctuations through a systematic transfer of wealth between high and low-performing stocks, a practice underscored by the principle of "reversal to the mean."

The ANTICOR algorithm is adaptable, employing empirical statistics to guide these strategic reallocations, based on stock performance over specified time windows. This behavior is driven by cross-correlation metrics that identify potentially advantageous shifts in investment allocations.

Empirical Results

The authors conducted extensive empirical analysis across a diverse set of historical data, encompassing markets such as NYSE, TSX, SP500, and DJIA. The ANTICOR algorithm exhibited commendable returns, often transcending the best stock within the dataset, a notable achievement indicating the algorithm's robust potential. It employs a combination of strategies and parameters (e.g., window size) to navigate varying market conditions effectively.

Implications and Caveats

While the ANTICOR algorithm demonstrates superior performance under certain conditions, the authors caution against over-optimism. The potential impact of transaction costs, market friction, and the variance introduced by rebalancing frequency are factors that could temper the algorithm’s real-world efficacy. They emphasize that while the present results are promising, especially in a setting devoid of commissions and trading frictions, widespread application without due consideration of these factors may diminish its effectiveness.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The paper sets the stage for re-evaluating assumptions about what truly constitutes successful portfolio strategies. By shifting focus from prediction to exploiting stable statistical relationships, the research invites a paradigm shift in financial forecasting practices. The implications for machine learning in finance are profound, suggesting that integrating sophisticated statistical techniques can enrich algorithmic trading frameworks.

Future Directions

The paper opens pathways for further exploration into how more advanced machine learning techniques could be harnessed to yield algorithms with enhanced tolerance to transaction costs and better overall performance. The authors speculate on developing analytical models to explain the efficacy of ANTICOR-type strategies comprehensively, potentially extending the framework to more dynamic adversarial models.

In conclusion, the paper provides a substantive contribution to computational finance, with empirical data underpinning the practical superiority of the ANTICOR algorithm under controlled conditions. It challenges entrenched notions of portfolio management by demonstrating a clear pathway to not just matching, but consistently beating, the best market performers.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com