Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
97 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
53 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
5 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Lesion Border Detection in Dermoscopy Images (1011.0640v1)

Published 30 Oct 2010 in cs.CV

Abstract: Background: Dermoscopy is one of the major imaging modalities used in the diagnosis of melanoma and other pigmented skin lesions. Due to the difficulty and subjectivity of human interpretation, computerized analysis of dermoscopy images has become an important research area. One of the most important steps in dermoscopy image analysis is the automated detection of lesion borders. Methods: In this article, we present a systematic overview of the recent border detection methods in the literature paying particular attention to computational issues and evaluation aspects. Conclusion: Common problems with the existing approaches include the acquisition, size, and diagnostic distribution of the test image set, the evaluation of the results, and the inadequate description of the employed methods. Border determination by dermatologists appears to depend upon higher-level knowledge, therefore it is likely that the incorporation of domain knowledge in automated methods will enable them to perform better, especially in sets of images with a variety of diagnoses.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. M. Emre Celebi (25 papers)
  2. Hitoshi Iyatomi (37 papers)
  3. Gerald Schaefer (16 papers)
  4. William V. Stoecker (6 papers)
Citations (479)

Summary

Lesion Border Detection in Dermoscopy Images: An Examination

The paper "Lesion Border Detection in Dermoscopy Images" by Celebi et al. investigates the automated detection of lesion borders in dermoscopy images, a critical step in the diagnosis of skin conditions such as melanoma. The complexity and subjective nature of human interpretation make the development of robust computerized techniques a pivotal focus in medical imaging research.

Background and Challenges

Dermoscopy is essential in visualizing subsurface structures of the skin, enhancing diagnostic accuracy for lesions that are clinically challenging. However, it may lower diagnostic accuracy in inexperienced hands, underscoring the necessity for computer-assisted analysis. Automated border detection is foundational due to its direct correlation with diagnostic features like asymmetry and border irregularity. Challenges arise from low contrast, irregular and fuzzy borders, artifacts, and heterogeneous internal coloring.

Methodological Review

The authors provide a systematic overview of existing border detection methodologies, highlighting preprocessing, segmentation, and postprocessing techniques.

Preprocessing

Key preprocessing techniques involve color space transformation, contrast enhancement, and artifact removal. Color space transformation simplifies image processing while enhancing lesion visibility. Methods like Independent Histogram Pursuit for contrast enhancement and various filters for artifact removal (e.g., Gaussian, median) are discussed, each with computational trade-offs.

Segmentation

The segmentation process is categorized into several methods such as histogram thresholding, clustering, and morphological analysis. Each method's applicability is analyzed, considering factors like scalar vs. vector processing, automation level, and parameterization requirements.

Postprocessing

Post-segmentation, operations such as region merging, island removal, and border smoothing are employed to refine lesion boundaries. The paper discusses techniques to achieve dermatology-aligned results, acknowledging the need for potential border expansion.

Evaluation and Implications

The authors critique the evaluation methodologies employed in border detection, noting reliance on single-expert annotations and challenges in comparing manual and automatic borders. Objective metrics, like the Normalized Probabilistic Rand Index, offer improved evaluations by accounting for annotation variability.

The need for public dermoscopy image sets is emphasized to standardize and robustly evaluate detection algorithms. Current limitations in automated systems versus dermatologist expertise are acknowledged, suggesting incorporation of higher-level domain knowledge to address complex diagnostic scenarios.

Conclusion and Future Directions

This comprehensive review underscores the critical role of automated lesion border detection in advancing dermoscopic diagnoses. While significant progress is noted, future developments should focus on reducing error variances between automated and dermatologist-determined borders and expanding image datasets to enhance paper robustness. The incorporation of domain-specific knowledge could lead to substantial improvements in diagnostic accuracy, fostering advancements in AI-driven medical imaging.