Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 99 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 43 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s
GPT-5 High 35 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 94 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 476 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 190 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Coordination Capacity (0909.2408v2)

Published 13 Sep 2009 in cs.IT and math.IT

Abstract: We develop elements of a theory of cooperation and coordination in networks. Rather than considering a communication network as a means of distributing information, or of reconstructing random processes at remote nodes, we ask what dependence can be established among the nodes given the communication constraints. Specifically, in a network with communication rates {R_{i,j}} between the nodes, we ask what is the set of all achievable joint distributions p(x1, ..., xm) of actions at the nodes of the network. Several networks are solved, including arbitrarily large cascade networks. Distributed cooperation can be the solution to many problems such as distributed games, distributed control, and establishing mutual information bounds on the influence of one part of a physical system on another.

Citations (237)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper introduces coordination capacity as the maximum rate at which network nodes can establish statistical dependence, focusing on achieving desired joint distributions rather than just transmitting data.
  • It analyzes coordination capacity across various network topologies, including two-node, cascade, isolated node, degraded source, and broadcast networks, applying tools like rate-distortion theory and Wyner's common information.
  • Key contributions include establishing communication bounds for strong coordination, particularly concerning the role of common randomness, and demonstrating how rate-distortion theory relates to the coordination capacity region.

Coordination Capacity in Communication Networks

The paper entitled "Coordination Capacity" by Paul Cuff, Haim Permuter, and Thomas M. Cover explores a novel perspective on communication networks by focusing not solely on the distribution of information, but on the ability to establish statistical dependence among nodes given communication constraints. This approach is further delineated through the concept of coordination capacity, encompassing elements of cooperation and the ability to achieve joint distributions of actions across an intricate network system.

Theoretical Foundations

The research broadens the scope of traditional network analysis by examining coordination rather than merely reconstructive transmission of data. It deviates from classical source coding paradigms, proposing a system where the central objective is to coordinate actions across nodes through joint probability distribution functions. This underscores the significance of establishing specific dependencies among nodes, pertinent to applications like distributed games, control systems, and the imposition of information bounds within physical networks.

To rigorously examine these ideas, the authors introduce concepts such as empirical coordination, where joint behavioral distributions approximate the desired distribution, and strong coordination, which endeavors for indistinguishability between the generated action sequences and samples drawn from the desired statistical distribution. The paper employs rate-distortion theory, the strong Markov lemma, and concepts from Wyner's common information to underpin these notions theoretically.

Network Scenarios Analyzed

The paper examines several network configurations to elucidate the principles of coordination capacity:

  1. Two-node Network: The foundational communication problem is considered where mutual information I(X; Y) dictates the lower bound on feasible communication rates necessary for achieving the desired coordination.
  2. Cascade Networks: The authors solve the coordination capacity in networks featuring sequential message passing, where the rates must satisfy I(X; Y, Z) and I(X; Z) for the establishment of joint distribution among nodes.
  3. Isolated Node Networks: It is revealed that a central node can influence peripheral nodes even when receiving no direct communication, showcasing intricate dependencies present without traditional data exchange.
  4. Degraded Source Networks: Through leveraging auxiliary random variables, the work extends insights from multiterminal coding problems, formulating necessary communication resources to manage coordinated reconstructions.
  5. Broadcast and Cascade-Multiterminal Networks: Detailed bounds are presented, addressing complicated network interactions where distinct messages must inform both center-stage and peripheral nodes, revealing underlying tension between independent and coordinated action distributions.

Key Contributions

One of the substantial outcomes introduced is the articulation of communication boundaries to achieve strong coordination in the absence and presence of common randomness. In alignment with Wyner's findings on common information, they provide insights into the minimum required volume of shared randomness that fulfills strong coordination needs.

Moreover, the interrelation between coordination capacity and rate-distortion theory is elucidated, identifying the latter as a projection of the coordination capacity region, thereby providing a more comprehensive understanding of coding space in networks.

Implications and Future Directions

This paper's insights into coordination capacity have profound implications for the design and optimization of networks. By establishing conditions and capacity regions for achieving desired coordination, it lays groundwork pivotal for applications such as resource allocation, cooperative communication, and the synthesis of correlated random variables in distributed systems.

Future research on network coordination capacity underlines a junction for advancements in artificial intelligence and information theory, particularly in systems where nodes are computational agents within distributed machine learning frameworks or autonomous control systems.

As the underlying complexity of networks continues to evolve, these findings no doubt will serve a critical role as architectures expand towards multi-dimensional, multi-agent settings that require coherent, coordinated operation for optimal functionality.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.