2D-Aware Workload Distribution Strategy

• 2D-aware workload distribution strategies are techniques that partition spatial or logical data into two-dimensional subdomains for optimized load balancing.
• They employ rectilinear, jagged, and hierarchical partitioning methods, with heuristics like JAG-M-HEUR and HIER-RELAXED to minimize the maximum load per processor.
• These strategies are vital in scientific simulations, imaging, and distributed processing, enhancing resource efficiency and reducing communication overhead.

A 2D-aware workload distribution strategy refers to a class of methods, algorithms, and heuristics that explicitly consider the two-dimensional (spatial or logical) structure of computational workload when partitioning it among processing resources. These strategies are critical in parallel scientific computing, distributed data processing, and streaming applications involving spatial data, where computational load exhibits heterogeneity and non-uniformity across two-dimensional domains, such as grids, matrices, or geographic spaces.

1. Classes of 2D-Aware Partitioning Strategies

Research into 2D-aware workload distribution has established and comparatively analyzed multiple partitioning families, notably:

• Rectilinear Partitions: The workload domain (typically, a matrix of non-negative integers representing computation) is divided into a regular $P \times Q$ grid. Each processor is assigned a contiguous rectangular block. This strategy is efficient in cases of relatively uniform spatial load distribution but can suffer from severe imbalance if the workload varies substantially across the domain.
• Jagged Partitions: These structures, particularly the classic "P-way jagged" partition, split one dimension into $P$ stripes, with each stripe independently partitioned into $Q$ blocks along the other dimension. The proposed "m-way jagged partition," an innovation in the literature, relaxes the constraint that each stripe receives an equal number of processors, instead allocating processors to each stripe proportionally to the stripe's total load, allowing for improved balance when the spatial distribution is highly skewed.
• Hierarchical (Recursive) Partitions: The space is recursively split along alternating dimensions, constructing a binary tree where each node represents a spatial subdomain. This recursive bisection can flexibly address irregular or fractal load landscapes, adjusting to local workload density.
• Hybrid/Two-Phase Schemes: Some strategies first use a coarse, rapid partitioning (e.g., a simple heuristic) to define primary subdomains, then apply more sophisticated (possibly optimal) partitioning within overloaded or critical subregions. This approach enables practitioners to balance partitioning quality with computational overhead, offering a tangible time/quality tradeoff.

2. Algorithmic Developments and Analytical Results

Optimal algorithms and practical heuristics underpin the deployment of 2D-aware workload distribution in real systems.

• Optimal Partitioning via Dynamic Programming: For m-way jagged and hierarchical partitioning, optimal solutions can be computed by recursive dynamic programming. For m-way jagged partitions, the recurrence examines every possible split and allocation of processors, seeking the minimum achievable maximum load per processor; for hierarchical bipartitions, all possible ways to split a rectangle and distribute processors are explored. While these frameworks are provably optimal, their running times—$O(n_1^2 m^3 (\log (n_2/m))^2)$ for jagged and $O(n_1^2 n_2^2 m^2 \log(\max(n_1, n_2)))$ for hierarchical—restrict their use to moderate problem sizes or selected subdomains in hybrids.
• Load-Balancing Heuristics: Practical partitioning at scale relies on heuristics, such as the JAG-M-HEUR (m-way jagged heuristic) or HIER-RELAXED (average-based hierarchical) algorithms. The JAG-M-HEUR procedure creates stripes using optimal 1D partitioning, assigns processors by stripe load, and then partitions each stripe, typically resulting in load imbalance (the gap between the maximal and average processor load) that outperforms traditional jagged and rectilinear approaches under both worst-case and typical circumstances.
• Worst-Case Guarantees: Analytical results provide upper bounds on imbalance, dependent on the number of processors, chosen partitioning scheme, and spatial load heterogeneity (parameterized by $$\Delta = \frac{\max_{i,j} A[i][j]}{\min_{i,j} A[i][j]}$$ for strictly positive loads).

3. Evaluation and Empirical Characterization

Empirical validation through simulation on a wide range of workload configurations demonstrates the practical advantages of advanced 2D-aware strategies:

• Superior Load Balancing: m-way jagged and hierarchical heuristics achieve substantially lower load imbalance than rectilinear or fixed jagged schemes, particularly in workloads with strong local hotspots or pronounced spatial variability.
• Efficiency of Hybrid Methods: Two-phase strategies (quick initial partitioning, followed by refinement of overloaded regions) deliver near-optimal load balance at a fraction of the optimal algorithm's computational cost, confirming the benefits of time/quality tradeoff design.
• Algorithm Selection: The JAG-M-HEUR-PROBE and HIER-RELAXED heuristics are recommended for large-scale applications due to their favorable balance of speed and partitioning quality, reserving dynamic programming only for smaller instances or refinement.

Algorithm	Partition Class	Complexity	Guarantee/Note
RECT-UNIFORM	Rectilinear	$O(PQ)$	No guarantee
RECT-NICOL	Rectilinear	high (iterative)	Improved area
JAG-PQ-HEUR	Jagged (P-way)	$O((P\log(n_1/P))^2 + P(Q\log(n_2/Q))^2)$	See above
JAG-M-HEUR	Jagged (m-way)	$O((P\log(n_1/P))^2 + (m\log(n_2/m))^2)$	Best heuristic
JAG-M-OPT	Jagged (m-way)	$O(n_1^2 m^3 (\log(n_2/m))^2)$	Optimal (slow)
HIER-RB	Hierarchical	$O(m\log(\max(n_1,n_2)))$	Fast heuristic
HIER-OPT	Hierarchical	$O(n_1^2 n_2^2 m^2 \log(\max(n_1,n_2)))$	Optimal
HIER-RELAXED	Hierarchical	$O(m^2 \log(\max(n_1,n_2)))$	Good compromise

4. Mathematical Formulation

2D-aware workload distribution is rigorously formalized for a workload matrix $A$ of size $n_1 \times n_2$, to be partitioned among $m$ processors as non-overlapping rectangles $r_i$ such that

$$L_{\max}(R) = \max_{r_i} \sum_{(x, y) \in r_i} A[x][y]$$

is minimized, with the ideal lower bound for any partitioned maximum load given by $\frac{\sum_{x, y} A[x][y]}{m}$ (average) and $\max_{x, y} A[x][y]$.

Key recurrence relations for the core algorithms include:

• For m-way jagged: $$L_{\max}(n_1, m) = \min_{1 \leq k \leq n_1, 1 \leq x \leq m} \max \{ L_{\max}(k-1, m-x),\ 1D(k, n_1, x) \}$$
• For hierarchical bipartition: \begin{align*} L_{\max}(x_1, x_2, y_1, y_2, m) = \min_{j} \bigg{ & \min_x \max{ L_{\max}(x_1, x, y_1, y_2, j),\ L_{\max}(x+1, x_2, y_1, y_2, m-j) }, \ & \min_y \max{ L_{\max}(x_1, x_2, y_1, y, j),\ L_{\max}(x_1, x_2, y+1, y_2, m-j) } \bigg} \end{align*}

Worst-case approximation ratios quantify the expected imbalance:

• m-way jagged: $$LI \leq \left(\frac{m}{m-P} + \frac{m\Delta}{Pn_2} + \frac{\Delta^2 m}{n_1 n_2}\right) - 1$$
• P-way jagged: $$LI \leq \left(1 + \Delta \frac{P}{n_1}\right)\left(1 + \Delta \frac{Q}{n_2}\right) - 1$$

5. Applications in Scientific and Data-Intensive Domains

2D-aware workload distribution strategies are foundational in several computational arenas:

• Particle-in-Cell and Mesh-based Simulations: Highly parallel simulations of physical phenomena benefit from optimized partitioning of spatial domains to minimize computation and interprocess communication.
• Direct Volume Rendering: For medical and scientific imaging tasks, balanced spatial splits directly translate to improved throughput and reduced latency.
• 3D Game Engines and Virtual Worlds: Real-time spatial partitioning for AI or physics computations uses 2D-aware techniques to manage player distribution and interaction efficiently.
• Distributed Linear Algebra and Matrix Kernels: Decomposing dense and sparse matrices for parallel computation, such as the 2D-FFT, leverages 2D partitions to exploit parallel hardware optimally.
• Streaming Spatial Data Processing: Frameworks processing spatial datastreams, such as those using SWARM or mixed key-based routing strategies, utilize adaptive 2D grid partitioning for balancing over dynamic and non-uniform distributions.

6. Theoretical and Practical Implications

The demonstrated advantages of advanced 2D-aware workload distribution strategies include:

• Resource Efficiency and Performance: Reduced load imbalance promotes better processor utilization, decreases total execution time, and minimizes idle and synchronization overhead.
• Scalability and Adaptivity: Dynamic adaptation to spatial and temporal variations in workload is especially important in large-scale, high-performance, and streaming system contexts.
• Communication Minimization: Well-designed partitions, especially rectangular and contiguous, reduce the boundary area per processor, positively impacting network communication volume and contention.
• Practical Algorithm Engineering: The combined use of swift heuristics for initial partitioning, with selective optimal partitioning for refinement, demonstrates the effective balancing of computational resources against solution quality—a recurring theme in high-performance computing practice.

---

2D-aware workload distribution strategies represent a central paradigm in the effective parallelization of spatially or logically structured computations. By explicitly modeling the two-dimensional structure of real-world workloads, these strategies enable high efficiency, flexibility, and scalability, and continue to serve as an active research area with wide-ranging practical applications in scientific, industrial, and data-intensive computing environments.