Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
51 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
60 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
8 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Tool-Star: Empowering LLM-Brained Multi-Tool Reasoner via Reinforcement Learning (2505.16410v1)

Published 22 May 2025 in cs.CL, cs.AI, and cs.LG

Abstract: Recently, LLMs have shown remarkable reasoning capabilities via large-scale reinforcement learning (RL). However, leveraging the RL algorithm to empower effective multi-tool collaborative reasoning in LLMs remains an open challenge. In this paper, we introduce Tool-Star, an RL-based framework designed to empower LLMs to autonomously invoke multiple external tools during stepwise reasoning. Tool-Star integrates six types of tools and incorporates systematic designs in both data synthesis and training. To address the scarcity of tool-use data, we propose a general tool-integrated reasoning data synthesis pipeline, which combines tool-integrated prompting with hint-based sampling to automatically and scalably generate tool-use trajectories. A subsequent quality normalization and difficulty-aware classification process filters out low-quality samples and organizes the dataset from easy to hard. Furthermore, we propose a two-stage training framework to enhance multi-tool collaborative reasoning by: (1) cold-start fine-tuning, which guides LLMs to explore reasoning patterns via tool-invocation feedback; and (2) a multi-tool self-critic RL algorithm with hierarchical reward design, which reinforces reward understanding and promotes effective tool collaboration. Experimental analyses on over 10 challenging reasoning benchmarks highlight the effectiveness and efficiency of Tool-Star. The code is available at https://github.com/dongguanting/Tool-Star.

Analysis of "Tool-Star: Empowering LLM-Brained Multi-Tool Reasoner via Reinforcement Learning"

The paper "Tool-Star: Empowering LLM-Brained Multi-Tool Reasoner via Reinforcement Learning" addresses a critical challenge in enhancing LLMs with reasoning capabilities by leveraging Reinforcement Learning (RL). This research presents an RL-based framework, Tool-Star, which aims to enable LLMs to autonomously utilize multiple external tools in a coordinated manner to perform complex reasoning tasks. The framework integrates six types of tools and introduces systematic improvements in both data synthesis and training methodologies.

Core Contributions

  1. Data Synthesis Pipeline: The scarcity of tool-use data is addressed through a novel tool-integrated data synthesis pipeline. This method combines tool-integrated prompting with hint-based sampling to create scalable and automatic tool-use trajectories. This approach involves generating reasoning data where tool usage is essential, quality normalizing the dataset, and classifying the data based on difficulty to promote gradual learning.
  2. Two-Stage Training Framework: Tool-Star employs a two-stage training process:
    • Cold-Start Fine-Tuning: This initial phase involves fine-tuning the LLMs to recognize reasoning patterns using feedback from tool invocation.
    • Multi-Tool Self-Critic RL Algorithm: This phase encourages the exploration of multi-tool use via a hierarchical reward structure that accounts for answer correctness, format adherence, and effective tool collaboration.
  3. Hierarchical Reward Design: A significant innovation is the introduction of a reward system that evaluates multiple aspects of the tool-using behavior. This reward mechanism not only focuses on the final answer's correctness but also on the collaborative tool usage, thereby fostering a more holistic understanding of task resolution strategies.
  4. Performance Evaluation: Extensive experiments conducted on over ten challenging reasoning benchmarks, ranging from computational to knowledge-intensive tasks, demonstrate Tool-Star's superior performance over traditional LLM configurations and previous tool-augmentation methods.

Numerical Outcomes and Implications

Tool-Star showcases marked improvements in reasoning task outcomes as evidenced by its performance on diverse datasets such as AIME24, MATH500, HotpotQA, and WebWalker. It achieves significant gains in reasoning efficiency and accuracy, indicating the potential for broader practical applications. The dual-stage training allows LLMs to progressively improve, thereby addressing the limitations of single-tool reliance and unveiling the feasibility of complex, real-world problem-solving scenarios.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

From a theoretical perspective, the paper contributes to the understanding of leveraging RL as a mechanism for tool selection and integration in LLMs. It offers insights into how complexity in reasoning tasks can be managed through structured training regimens and reward systems. Practically, the framework demonstrates potential applications in fields that demand adaptive problem-solving capabilities, such as education, scientific research, and automated systems.

Future Directions

The research paves the way for several avenues in the AI domain:

  • Scalability: Future work could explore the scaling of this framework to larger models with more parameters to assess the adaptability and robustness across various contexts.
  • Tool Diversity: Incorporating additional tools, potentially those with domain-specific functionalities, may enhance the flexibility and scope of applications.
  • Ethical Considerations: Addressing the risk of inappropriate or biased tool usage remains crucial, especially in high-stakes environments.

In conclusion, the Tool-Star framework represents a meaningful advancement in the development of reasoning capabilities in LLMs by integrating RL and multi-tool collaboration, establishing a foundation for more autonomous and efficient AI systems.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (10)
  1. Guanting Dong (46 papers)
  2. Yifei Chen (58 papers)
  3. Xiaoxi Li (24 papers)
  4. Jiajie Jin (14 papers)
  5. Hongjin Qian (23 papers)
  6. Yutao Zhu (63 papers)
  7. Hangyu Mao (37 papers)
  8. Guorui Zhou (48 papers)
  9. Zhicheng Dou (113 papers)
  10. Ji-Rong Wen (299 papers)