Improving the Reliability of LLMs: Combining CoT, RAG, Self-Consistency, and Self-Verification (2505.09031v1)

Abstract: Hallucination, where LLMs generate confident but incorrect or irrelevant information, remains a key limitation in their application to complex, open-ended tasks. Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting has emerged as a promising method for improving multistep reasoning by guiding models through intermediate steps. However, CoT alone does not fully address the hallucination problem. In this work, we investigate how combining CoT with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG), as well as applying self-consistency and self-verification strategies, can reduce hallucinations and improve factual accuracy. By incorporating external knowledge sources during reasoning and enabling models to verify or revise their own outputs, we aim to generate more accurate and coherent responses. We present a comparative evaluation of baseline LLMs against CoT, CoT+RAG, self-consistency, and self-verification techniques. Our results highlight the effectiveness of each method and identify the most robust approach for minimizing hallucinations while preserving fluency and reasoning depth.

Improving the Reliability of LLMs: Combining Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

The paper "Improving the Reliability of LLMs: Combining Chain-of-Thought Reasoning and Retrieval-Augmented Generation" addresses a significant issue faced by LLMs: hallucination. Hallucination involves the generation of plausible but incorrect or irrelevant information by LLMs, which poses a substantial challenge in their application to complex, open-ended tasks. This phenomenon is particularly troublesome for applications requiring high accuracy and reliability, such as automated content creation, customer support, or legal and medical information dissemination.

The authors investigate the efficacy of integrating Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning with Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) to mitigate hallucinations in LLMs. Additionally, they incorporate self-consistency and self-verification strategies to further enhance the reliability and factual accuracy of the model outputs. CoT reasoning helps guide the model through intermediate reasoning steps, while RAG uses external, verifiable information sources to reinforce these steps with factual grounding.

Core Methodologies

The authors propose a multi-pronged approach combining several techniques:

1. Chain-of-Thought (CoT) Reasoning: This involves prompting models into stepwise reasoning to increase their accuracy on intricate, multistep tasks. CoT reasoning provides internal validation by structuring LLM outputs as logical sequences.
2. Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG): By integrating RAG, models retrieve relevant external knowledge that helps to substantiate reasoning processes and mitigate the risk of inaccuracies in generated content.
3. Self-Consistency: This strategy involves generating multiple candidate responses and selecting the most consistent answer across different attempts. It contributes toward reducing stochastic errors and enhancing response reliability.
4. Self-Verification: This entails enabling LLMs to verify their outputs against known, verified information, thereby correcting their responses when necessary. Involves iterative refining and validation against predefined answers and external data sources.

Results and Analysis

The authors conducted evaluations using models such as GPT-3.5-Turbo, DeepSeek, and Llama 2 on the HaluEval, TruthfulQA, and FEVER datasets. They measured performance via metrics including retrieval-augmented generation, chain-of-thought reasoning, and combinations incorporating self-consistency and self-verification. The results demonstrate that combining RAG with CoT, and employing self-consistency and self-verification techniques, significantly reduces hallucination rates while preserving reasoning depth and fluency.

Key Findings

• Reduction in Hallucination Rates: The integration of CoT, RAG, self-consistency, and self-verification proves effective in mitigating hallucinations. Specifically, self-verification and the combination of RAG + CoT showed significant performance improvements, with self-verification slightly outperforming the other methods in terms of factual accuracy in certain datasets.
• Improved Factual Accuracy: The combination of RAG + CoT strengthens factual grounding by providing retrieval-based evidence during the reasoning process, leading to more coherent and accurate responses.
• Evaluation Framework Adaptability: The paper emphasizes utilizing various evaluation metrics tailored to specific datasets, reflecting the nuanced understanding of where and how hallucinations can manifest differently across tasks.

Implications and Future Directions

This research demonstrates notable advancements in enhancing the reliability of LLMs by addressing hallucination. The combined use of CoT and RAG, complemented by self-consistency and self-verification, offers a comprehensive strategy to enhance the factual correctness and reliability of LLM outputs. The paper suggests several potential future research directions:

• Multilingual Extension: Assessing the techniques in multilingual contexts to understand their effectiveness across different languages and cultural nuances.
• Optimization of Retrieval Techniques: Refining retrieval strategies using dense passage retrieval or domain-specific fine-tuning to improve the quality of retrieved documents, thus enhancing factual consistency.
• Dynamic Chain-of-Thought Prompts: Develop adaptive prompting strategies that adjust based on input characteristics to optimize reasoning processes and reduce computational costs.

In conclusion, this paper presents a significant contribution to the ongoing research focused on improving LLM reliability. By effectively integrating existing reasoning and retrieval techniques, it suggests robust pathways to curtail the persistent challenge of hallucinations in LLM applications.