Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
38 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

SQuat: Subspace-orthogonal KV Cache Quantization (2503.24358v1)

Published 31 Mar 2025 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.CL, cs.IT, and math.IT

Abstract: The key-value (KV) cache accelerates LLMs decoding by storing KV tensors from previously generated tokens. It reduces redundant computation at the cost of increased memory usage. To mitigate this overhead, existing approaches compress KV tensors into lower-bit representations; however, quantization errors can accumulate as more tokens are generated, potentially resulting in undesired outputs. In this paper, we introduce SQuat (Subspace-orthogonal KV cache quantization). It first constructs a subspace spanned by query tensors to capture the most critical task-related information. During key tensor quantization, it enforces that the difference between the (de)quantized and original keys remains orthogonal to this subspace, minimizing the impact of quantization errors on the attention mechanism's outputs. SQuat requires no model fine-tuning, no additional calibration dataset for offline learning, and is grounded in a theoretical framework we develop. Through numerical experiments, we show that our method reduces peak memory by 2.17 to 2.82, improves throughput by 2.45 to 3.60, and achieves more favorable benchmark scores than existing KV cache quantization algorithms.

An Expert Analysis on SQuat: Subspace-orthogonal KV Cache Quantization

"SQuat: Subspace-orthogonal KV Cache Quantization," presents a novel approach to the quantization of key-value (KV) caches in LLMs. This research pivots from traditional compression-based quantization methods towards a methodology that fundamentally aligns with the operational efficiency demanded by modern LLMs. By leveraging the subspace-orthogonal properties of query tensors, the proposed SQuat method aims to minimize the detrimental effects of quantization errors on LLM inference without the need for model fine-tuning or additional data.

The heart of the paper discusses the inherent inefficiencies and memory constraints introduced by KV caches, which store large amounts of computed tensors to expedite inference. This is especially critical given the increasing demands posed by LLMs which require substantial resources. Prior quantization strategies—primarily treating the process as a lossy data compression problem—often fail to address the compounded errors in key tensor quantization, which potentially degrade the quality of generated outputs due to the accumulation of inaccuracies over extended token sequences.

Methodological Insights

The paper introduces SQuat, a method grounded in the recognition that the critical information during the attention mechanism in transformers is greatly influenced by the maintenance of inner-products between query and key tensors rather than merely minimizing absolute differences. The attention mechanism’s reliance on the inner product of key and query tensors necessitates a quantization method that minimizes disruption to these products, particularly for future queries.

SQuat constructs a subspace from the query vectors of prompt tokens, leveraging the finding that these vectors often reside within a low-dimensional subspace that encapsulates the essential task-related information. This characteristic mitigates the need to anticipate future query vectors explicitly. The structure of this model allows key tensors to be quantized so that deviations remain orthogonal to this task-specific subspace, thereby reducing errors that would impact attention outputs and subsequent LLM predictions.

Further, by not requiring LLM re-training or the use of a calibration dataset, SQuat stands out for its ease of implementation while enhancing performance efficiency. The numerical experiments corroborate the effectiveness of this approach, showing significant reductions in peak memory and improvements in throughput while achieving superior task benchmarks compared to existing methods.

Experimental Validation and Implications

The experiments conducted employed four diverse LLMs, demonstrating SQuat’s robustness across a variety of benchmarks including reasoning and long-context understanding tasks. SQuat's efficacy is particularly notable in handling long response tasks, a commonly challenging scenario for LLMs where KV caches often become a bottleneck. Memory usage was reduced by 2.17 to 2.82 times, with throughput improvements ranging from 2.45 to 3.60 times compared to standard formats—illustrating not only a qualitative enhancement in performance metrics but also substantial practical benefits in operational environments.

Future Developments and Theoretical Considerations

This paper lays a foundation for further exploration in various dimensions. A promising direction involves extending these findings to architectures such as multi-head latent attention where latent representations replace traditional KV caches. The implications of quantizing latent vectors offer a compelling area for investigation, potentially transcending current quantization paradigms and enhancing model efficiencies further.

From a theoretical standpoint, a rigorous exploration of the trade-offs introduced by varying degrees of quantization and their effects on the response quality in LLMs could yield strategic insights. Such studies could catalyze the development of dynamic quantization techniques tailored for different task complexities or model sizes, optimizing both computational resource allocation and output accuracy.

In conclusion, SQuat exemplifies the logical progression of quantization techniques in the context of KV cache management, effectively aligning theoretical insights with practical urgencies in AI and machine learning deployments. This paper could spur additional breakthroughs that enable more efficient, accessible, and adaptable deployment of LLMs in real-world applications.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Hao Wang (1119 papers)
  2. Ligong Han (39 papers)
  3. Kai Xu (312 papers)
  4. Akash Srivastava (50 papers)
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com